Clinical usefulness of adherence to gastro-esophageal reflux disease guideline by Spanish gastroenterologists

被引:2
作者
Mearin, Fermin [1 ]
Ponce, Julio [2 ,3 ]
Ponce, Marta [3 ,4 ]
Balboa, Agustin [1 ]
Gonzalez, Miguel A. [5 ]
Zapardiel, Javier [6 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Med Teknon, Serv Gastroenterol, Barcelona 08022, Spain
[2] Hosp Quiron, Digest Dis Unit, Valencia 46010, Spain
[3] Ctr Invest Biomed Red Enfermedades Hepaticasy Dig, Barcelona 08036, Spain
[4] Hosp Univ La Fe, Serv Gastroenterol, Valencia 46026, Spain
[5] Innovex Grp Quintiles Espana, Madrid 28033, Spain
[6] AstraZeneca Farmaceut, Dept Med, Madrid 28033, Spain
关键词
Gastro-esophageal reflux disease; Clinical practice guidelines; Adherence to guidelines; Treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; IMPACT; MANAGEMENT; IMPLEMENTATION; ESOPHAGITIS; PHYSICIANS; ATTITUDES; SYMPTOMS; ADULTS;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v18.i35.4885
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To investigate usefulness of adherence to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) guideline established by the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology. METHODS: Prospective, observational and multi-centre study of 301 patients with typical symptoms of GERD who should be managed in accordance with guidelines and were attended by gastroenterologists in daily practice. Patients (aged > 18 years) were eligible for inclusion if they had typical symptoms of GERD (heartburn and/or acid regurgitation) as the major complaint in the presence or absence of accompanying atypical symptoms, such as dyspeptic symptoms and/or supraesophageal symptoms. Diagnostic and therapeutic decisions should be made based on specific recommendations of the Spanish clinical practice guideline for GERD which is a widely disseminated and well known instrument among Spanish in digestive disease specialists. RESULTS: Endoscopy was indicated in 123 (41%) patients: 50 with alarm symptoms, 32 with age > 50 years without alarm symptom. Seventy-two patients (58.5%) had esophagitis (grade A, 23, grade B, 28, grade C, 18, grade D, 3). In the presence of alarm symptoms, endoscopy was indicated consistently with recommendations in 98% of cases. However, in the absence of alarm symptoms, endoscopy was indicated in 33% of patients > 50 years (not recommended by the guideline). Adherence for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) therapy was 80%, but doses prescribed were lower (half) in 5% of cases and higher (double) in 15%. Adherence regarding duration of PPI therapy was 69%; duration was shorter than recommended in 1% (4 wk in esophagitis grades C-D) or longer in 30% (8 wk in esophagitis grades A-B or in patients without endoscopy). Treatment response was higher when PPI doses were consistent with guidelines, although differences were not significant (95% vs 85%). CONCLUSION: GERD guideline compliance was quite good although endoscopy was over indicated in patients > 50 years without alarm symptoms; PPIs were prescribed at higher doses and longer duration. (c) 2012 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4885 / 4891
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Posting Guidelines: A Practical and Effective Way to Promote Appropriate Hypertension Treatment
    Adair, Richard
    Callies, Lisa
    Lageson, Jean
    Hanzel, Kristen L.
    Streitz, Susan M.
    Gantert, Sarah C.
    [J]. JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2005, 31 (04) : 227 - 232
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1999, Gastrointest Endosc, V49, P834
  • [3] The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: A progress report on observer agreement
    Armstrong, D
    Bennett, JR
    Blum, AL
    Dent, J
    deDombal, FT
    Galmiche, JP
    Lundell, L
    Margulies, M
    Richter, JE
    Spechler, SJ
    Tytgat, GNJ
    Wallin, L
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 111 (01) : 85 - 92
  • [4] Canadian Consensus Conference on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults - Update 2004
    Armstrong, D
    Marshall, JK
    Chiba, N
    Enns, R
    Fallone, CA
    Fass, R
    Hollingworth, R
    Hunt, RH
    Kahrilas, PJ
    Mayrand, S
    Moayyedi, P
    Paterson, WG
    Sadowski, D
    van Zanten, SJV
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 19 (01): : 15 - 35
  • [5] Are dyspepsia management guidelines coherent with primary care practice?
    Cardin, F
    Zorzi, M
    Furlanetto, A
    Guerra, C
    Bandini, F
    Polito, D
    Bano, F
    Grion, AM
    Toffanin, R
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 37 (11) : 1269 - 1275
  • [6] Davis DA, 1997, CAN MED ASSOC J, V157, P408
  • [7] An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management - the Genval workshop report
    Dent, J
    Brun, J
    Fendrick, AM
    Fennerty, MB
    Janssens, J
    Kahrilas, PJ
    Lauritsen, K
    Reynolds, JC
    Shaw, M
    Talley, NJ
    [J]. GUT, 1999, 44 : S1 - S16
  • [8] Epidemiology of gastrooesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review
    Dent, J
    El-Serag, HB
    Wallander, MA
    Johansson, S
    [J]. GUT, 2005, 54 (05) : 710 - 717
  • [9] Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies
    Grimshaw, JM
    Thomas, RE
    MacLennan, G
    Fraser, C
    Ramsay, CR
    Vale, L
    Whitty, P
    Eccles, MP
    Matowe, L
    Shirran, L
    Wensing, M
    Dijkstra, R
    Donaldson, C
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2004, 8 (06) : 1 - +
  • [10] Grol R, 2001, MED CARE, V39, pII46