Life Cycle Sustainability Evaluations of Bio-based Value Chains: Reviewing the Indicators from a Swedish Perspective

被引:58
作者
Martin, Michael [1 ]
Royne, Frida [2 ]
Ekvall, Tomas [1 ,3 ]
Moberg, Asa [1 ]
机构
[1] IVL Swedish Environm Res Inst, POB 210 60, S-10031 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] RISE Res Inst Sweden, Eklandagatan 86, S-41261 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Technol Management & Econ, Div Environm Syst, Vera Sandbergs Alle 8, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
sustainability; life cycle assessment; SLCA; social; economic; LCC; LCSA; bio-based; bioeconomy; LAND-USE IMPACTS; BIOECONOMY; BIOFUELS; SYSTEMS; BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; CHINA; LCA;
D O I
10.3390/su10020547
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Policymakers worldwide are promoting the use of bio-based products as part of sustainable development. Nonetheless, there are concerns that the bio-based economy may undermine the sustainability of the transition, e.g., from the overexploitation of biomass resources and indirect impacts of land use. Adequate assessment methods with a broad systems perspective are thus required in order to ensure a transition to a sustainable, bio-based economy. We review the scientifically published life cycle studies of bio-based products in order to investigate the extent to which they include important sustainability indicators. To define which indicators are important, we refer to established frameworks for sustainability assessment, and include an Open Space workshop with academics and industrial experts. The results suggest that there is a discrepancy between the indicators that we found to be important, and the indicators that are frequently included in the studies. This indicates a need for the development and dissemination of improved methods in order to model several important environmental impacts, such as: water depletion, indirect land use change, and impacts on ecosystem quality and biological diversity. The small number of published social life cycle assessments (SLCAs) and life cycle sustainability assessments (LCSAs) indicate that these are still immature tools; as such, there is a need for improved methods and more case studies.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] An extended life cycle analysis of packaging systems for fruit and vegetable transport in Europe
    Albrecht, Stefan
    Brandstetter, Peter
    Beck, Tabea
    Fullana-i-Palmer, Pere
    Gronman, Kaisa
    Baitz, Martin
    Deimling, Sabine
    Sandilands, Julie
    Fischer, Matthias
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (08) : 1549 - 1567
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe, DOI [10.2777/6462, DOI 10.2777/6462]
  • [3] Benoit C., 2009, Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: social and socio-economic LCA guidelines complementing environmental LCA and Life Cycle Costing, contributing to the full assessment of goods and services within the context of sustainable development
  • [4] Bioenergiportalen, AND BIODR OK
  • [5] R&D decision support by parallel assessment of economic, ecological and social impact - Adipic acid from renewable resources versus adipic acid from crude oil
    Colodel, Cecilia Makishi
    Kupfer, Thilo
    Barthel, Leif-Patrik
    Albrecht, Stefan
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (06) : 1599 - 1604
  • [6] High-Resolution Assessment of Land Use Impacts on Biodiversity in Life Cycle Assessment Using Species Habitat Suitability Models
    de Baan, Laura
    Curran, Michael
    Rondinin, Carlo
    Visconti, Piero
    Hellweg, Stefanie
    Koellner, Thomas
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (04) : 2237 - 2244
  • [7] EC, 2013, OFF J EUR UNION, V54, P124
  • [8] Screening potential social impacts of fossil fuels and biofuels for vehicles
    Ekener-Petersen, Elisabeth
    Hoglund, Jonas
    Finnveden, Goran
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 73 : 416 - 426
  • [9] Ekvall T., 2017, B238 IVL SWED ENV RE
  • [10] Ekvall T, 2016, B2268 IVL SWED ENV R