A survey of selected animal-based measures of dairy cattle welfare in the Eastern Alps: Toward context-based thresholds

被引:27
作者
Zuliani, A. [1 ]
Mair, M. [2 ]
Krasevec, M. [3 ]
Lora, I. [4 ]
Brscic, M. [4 ]
Cozzi, G. [2 ,4 ]
Leeb, C.
Zupan, M. [3 ]
Winckler, C. [2 ]
Bovolenta, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Udine, Dept Food Agr Environm & Anim Sci, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[2] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Dept Sustainable Agr Syst, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Ljubljana, Dept Anim Sci, Domzale 1230, Slovenia
[4] Univ Padua, Dept Anim Med Prod & Hlth, I-35020 Legnaro, Italy
关键词
mountain farm; small-scale; animal welfare; benchmarking; MILK-PRODUCTION; COWS; PASTURE; HEALTH; HERDS; PREVALENCE; INJURIES; LAMENESS; SYSTEMS; SWISS;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2017-13257
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
In the Alps, traditional dairy farms are small-scale operations where vertical transhumance from valley indoor housing systems to highland pasture-based systems is still practiced in summer. Vertical transhumance implies a substantial change of environment, available resources, and management practices from one season to another. In such systems, animal-based welfare measures need to be monitored throughout the year to capture the variation of welfare outcomes, based on which targeted welfare management plans can be implemented. Because the Welfare Quality assessment approach has been tailored to indoor housing and intensive farming systems, the European Food Safety Authority recently developed a welfare assessment protocol for small-scale dairy cattle farms adapted after the Welfare Quality framework. The aim of this study was to assess nonbehavioral animal-based measures as defined by this protocol at different time points for transhumant systems in the Alps. In total, 18 animal-based measures were assessed before, during, and after the mountain pasture period in a sample of 67 small-scale dairy cattle farms practicing vertical transhumance in neighboring provinces of Austria, Italy, and Slovenia. Significant differences between assessments were identified for dirtiness of legs and teats, hairless patches, lesions and swellings, claw condition, ocular discharge, and diarrhea whereas BCS, lameness/severe lameness, vulvar discharge, nasal discharge, and hampered respiration were unchanged between seasons. In addition, a benchmarking exercise was carried out to identify relative boundaries (worst quartile thresholds) for each animal-based measure and to contribute to the discussion about achievable welfare outcomes for the 2 husbandry conditions that characterize a transhumant system. Worst quartile thresholds indicated a high prevalence of dirtiness (>80%) when cows were kept indoors, high prevalence of hairless patches (65%) before pasture turnout, and high prevalence of very lean cows (>13%) throughout the assessments. On the other hand, the best quartile thresholds for most clinical conditions suggested that high welfare standards (zero prevalence) are widely achievable in mountain farms practicing vertical transhumance during all assessments. The thresholds identified through benchmarking should serve as the basis for an effective context-based welfare management strategy promoting continuous welfare improvement on-farm.
引用
收藏
页码:1428 / 1436
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, TERR AN HLTH CAR
  • [2] [Anonymous], 34700 ISO TS
  • [3] Scientific Opinion on the assessment of dairy cow welfare in small-scale farming systems
    Authie, Edith
    Berg, Charlotte
    Botner, Anette
    Browman, Howard
    De Koeijer, Aline
    Depner, Klaus
    Domingo, Mariano
    Edwards, Sandra
    Fourichon, Christine
    Koenen, Frank
    More, Simon
    Raj, Mohan
    Sihvonen, Liisa
    Spoolder, Hans
    Stegeman, Jan Arend
    Thulke, Hans-Hermann
    Vagsholm, Ivar
    Velarde, Antonio
    Willeberg, Preben
    Ducrot, Christian
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2015, 13 (06)
  • [4] Environmental sustainability of Alpine livestock farms
    Battaglini, Luca
    Bovolenta, Stefano
    Gusmeroli, Fausto
    Salvador, Sara
    Sturaro, Enrico
    [J]. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2014, 13 (02) : 431 - 443
  • [5] International cooperation in animal welfare: The Welfare Quality® project
    Blokhuis H.J.
    [J]. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 50 (Suppl 1)
  • [6] Effect of grazing on the cow welfare of dairy herds evaluated by a multidimensional welfare index
    Burow, E.
    Rousing, T.
    Thomsen, P. T.
    Otten, N. D.
    Sorensen, J. T.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2013, 7 (05) : 834 - 842
  • [7] Description and factors of variation of the overall health score in French dairy cattle herds using the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol
    Coignard, M.
    Guatteo, R.
    Veissier, I.
    des Roches, A. de Boyer
    Mounier, L.
    Lehebel, A.
    Bareille, N.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2013, 112 (3-4) : 296 - 308
  • [8] Effect of summer grazing on welfare of dairy cows reared in mountain tie-stall barns
    Corazzin, Mirco
    Piasentier, Edi
    Dovier, Simonetta
    Bovolenta, Stefano
    [J]. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2010, 9 (03) : 304 - 312
  • [9] Trained-user opinion about Welfare Quality measures and integrated scoring of dairy cattle welfare
    de Graaf, S.
    Ampe, B.
    Winckler, C.
    Radeski, M.
    Mounier, L.
    Kirchner, M. . K.
    Haskell, M. J.
    van Eerdenburg, F. J. C. M.
    des Roches, A. de Boyer
    Andreasen, S. N.
    Bijttebier, J.
    Lauwers, L.
    Verbeke, W.
    Tuyttens, F. A. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2017, 100 (08) : 6376 - 6388
  • [10] Evaluating results of the Welfare Quality multi-criteria evaluation model for classification of dairy cattle welfare at the herd level
    de Vries, M.
    Bokkers, E. A. M.
    van Schaik, G.
    Botreau, R.
    Engel, B.
    Dijkstra, T.
    de Boer, I. J. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2013, 96 (10) : 6264 - 6273