Effect of increasing the intensity of implementing pneumonia guidelines - A randomized, controlled trial

被引:156
作者
Yealy, DM
Auble, TE
Stone, RA
Lave, JR
Meehan, TP
Graff, LG
Fine, JM
Obrosky, DS
Mor, MK
Whittle, J
Fine, MJ
机构
[1] Vet Adm Pittsburgh Healthcare Syst, Ctr Hlth Equ Res & Promot, Pittsburgh, PA 15240 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[3] Qualidigm, Middletown, CT USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[5] New Britain Gen Hosp, New Britain, CT USA
[6] Norwalk Hosp, Norwalk, CT 06856 USA
[7] Univ Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[8] Clement J Zablocki Vet Adm Med Ctr, Milwaukee, WI USA
[9] Med Coll Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-143-12-200512200-00006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Despite the development of evidence-based pneumonia guidelines, limited data exist on the most effective means to implement guideline recommendations into clinical practice. Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of 3 guideline implementation strategies. Design: Cluster-randomized, controlled trial. Setting: 32 emergency departments in Pennsylvania and Connecticut. Patients: 3219 patients with a clinical and radiographic diagnosis of pneumonia. Interventions: The authors implemented a project-developed guideline for the initial site of treatment based on the Pneumonia Severity Index and performance of evidence-based processes of care at the emergency department level. Guideline implementation strategies were defined as low (n = 8), moderate (n = 12), and high intensity (n = 12). Measurements: Effectiveness outcomes were the rate at which low-risk patients were treated on an outpatient basis and the performance of recommended processes of care. Safety outcomes included death, subsequent hospitalization for outpatients, and medical complications for inpatients. Results: More low-risk patients (n = 1901) were treated as outpatients in the moderate-intensity and high-intensity groups in the low-intensity group (high-intensity group, 61.9%; moderate-intensity group, 61.0%; low-intensity group, 37.5%; P = 0.004). More outpatients (n = 1125) in the high-intensity group received all 4 recommended processes of care (high-intensity group, 60.9%; moderate-intensity group, 28.3%; low-intensity group, 25.3%; P < 0.001); more inpatients (n = 2076) in the high-intensity group received all 4 recommended processes of care (high-intensity group, 44.3%; moderate-intensity group, 30.1 %; low-intensity group, 23.0%; P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences in safety outcomes were observed across interventions. Limitations: Twenty percent of eligible patients were not enrolled, and data on effectiveness outcomes were not collected before the trial. Conclusions: Both moderate-intensity and high-intensity guideline implementation strategies safely increased the proportion of low-risk patients with pneumonia who were treated as outpatients. The high-intensity strategy was most effective for increasing the performance of the recommended processes of care for outpatients and inpatients.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 894
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Safely increasing the proportion of patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated as outpatients - An interventional trial
    Atlas, SJ
    Benzer, TI
    Borowsky, LH
    Chang, YC
    Burnham, DC
    Metlay, JP
    Halm, EA
    Singer, DE
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (12) : 1350 - 1356
  • [2] Bartlett John G., 2000, Clinical Infectious Diseases, V31, P347, DOI 10.1086/313954
  • [3] Bero LA, 1998, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V317, P465
  • [4] Developing and testing changes in delivery of care
    Berwick, DM
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 128 (08) : 651 - 656
  • [5] BROWNE WJ, 2003, ESTIMATION MLWIN VER
  • [6] Outpatient care compared with hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia -: A randomized trial in low-risk patients
    Carratalà, J
    Fernández-Sabé, N
    Ortega, L
    Castellsagué, X
    Rosón, B
    Dorca, J
    Fernández-Agüera, A
    Verdaguer, R
    Martínez, J
    Manresa, F
    Gudiol, F
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 142 (03) : 165 - 172
  • [7] Improving the quality of care for patients with pneumonia in very small hospitals
    Chu, LA
    Bratzler, DW
    Lewis, RJ
    Murray, C
    Moore, L
    Shook, C
    Weingarten, SR
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (03) : 326 - 332
  • [8] Preferences for home vs hospital care among low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia
    Coley, CM
    Li, YH
    Medsger, AR
    Marrie, TJ
    Fine, MJ
    Kapoor, WN
    Lave, JR
    Detsky, AS
    Weinstein, MC
    Singer, DE
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 156 (14) : 1565 - 1571
  • [9] *CTR MED MED SERV, 2005, NAT PNEUM MED QUAL I
  • [10] Davis DA, 1997, CAN MED ASSOC J, V157, P408