Growth responses of Chondrus ocellatus Holmes (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) to two endophytes, Mikrosyphar zosterae Kuckuck (Ectocarpales, Ochrophyta) and Ulvella ramosa (N. L. Gardner) R. Nielsen (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) in culture

被引:6
作者
Ogandagal, Cyr Abel Maranguy [1 ,2 ]
Choil, Han Gil [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Jang Kyun [3 ]
Nam, Ki Wan [4 ]
机构
[1] Wonkwang Univ, Fac Biol Sci, Iksan 54538, South Korea
[2] Wonkwang Univ, Inst Environm Sci, Iksan 54538, South Korea
[3] Incheon Natl Univ, Dept Marine Sci, Inchon 22012, South Korea
[4] Pukyong Natl Univ, Dept Marine Biol, Busan 48513, South Korea
关键词
Chondrus ocellatus; growth; infection; Mikrosyphar zosterae; Ulvella ramosa; MAZZAELLA-LAMINARIOIDES RHODOPHYTA; GREEN PATCH DISEASE; CRISPUS RHODOPHYTA; ACROCHAETE-OPERCULATA; INFECTIOUS-DISEASES; HOST-SPECIFICITY; LIFE-HISTORY; SP-NOV; ALGAE; MACROALGAE;
D O I
10.4490/algae.2016.31.12.9
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
To examine the effects of two endophytic algae, Mikrosyphar zosterae (brown alga) and Ulvella ramosa (green alga), on the host Chondrus ocellatus (red alga), culture experiments were conducted. Four treatments were made: endophyte-free (Chondrus only), endophyte-M (Chondrus + Mikrosyphar), endophyte-U (Chondrus + Ulvella), and endophytes-M.U (Chondrus + Mikrosyphar + Ulvella). After 3 weeks, the relative growth rates (RGRs) of frond lengths and the number of newly formed bladelets were examined. M. zosterae formed wart-like dots on C. ocellatus fronds, whereas U. ramosa made dark spots. The RGRs of frond lengths of C. ocellatus were significantly greater in the endophyte-free and endophyte-M treatment groups than in the endophyte- U and endophytes-M" U treatment groups, indicating that the growth of host C. ocellatus was inhibited more by the green endophyte U. ramosa than the brown endophyte M. zosterae. The number of newly produced bladelets was greater in the endophyte-U and endophytes-M" U groups than in the endophyte-free and endophyte-M treatment groups. These results indicate that the two endophytes inhibit growth of the host C. ocellatus. The negative effects of U. ramosa on C. ocellatus growth were more severe than those caused by M. zosterae. Furthermore, U. ramosa destroyed the apical meristems of C. ocellatus, whereas M. zosterae did not. On the other hand, C. ocellatus showed compensatory growth in the form of lateral branch production as U. ramosa attacked its apical meristems.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 371
页数:9
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据