Cyclic response and modelling of special moment resisting beams exhibiting fixed-end rotation

被引:16
作者
Ahmad, Naveed [1 ]
Masoudi, Mostafa [2 ]
Salawdeh, Suhaib [3 ]
机构
[1] UET Peshawar, Dept Civil Engn, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan
[2] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran
[3] GMIT, Galway Mayo Inst Technol, Galway, Ireland
关键词
Special moment-resisting frames; Fiber-section element; Fixed-end rotation; Pinching behavior; Bar-slip; ACI; 318; ASCE41; Eurocode; 2; NONLINEAR-ANALYSIS; SLIP; DEFORMATIONS; SIMULATE; BEHAVIOR; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1007/s10518-020-00987-w
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Rebar slippage in reinforced concrete (RC) elements results in concrete expansion, large cracks, and consequently, early deterioration of strength as well as premature stiffness degradation, particularly in the inelastic energy dissipating zones. Although design standards prescribe different minimum concrete compressive strength, seismic evaluation and retrofit standards, and guidelines permit the use of provisions regarding bond strength and bar slippage issues regardless of the minimum specified concrete strength postulated in design standards. To better understand the seismic behavior of special moment-resisting (SMR) beams exhibiting fixed-end rotation resulting from the rebars inelastic elongation and slip, quasi-static cyclic tests were performed on eight full-scale SMR beams. The chosen beams have longitudinal reinforcement ratios of 0.84% (Type-1) and 1.26% (Type-2) with a shear-span to depth ratio of 6.14 and detailed following the provisions of ACI-318-19. Two specimens were prepared for each reinforcement ratio using concrete with compressive strengths equal to 2000 psi (14 MPa, M14) and 3000 psi (21 MPa, M21). The specimens were tested under cyclic displacement protocols, exhibiting flexure yielding that was followed by diagonal shear cracking and, ultimately, bond failure at the beam-block interface. It is even though the beams fulfill the requirements of ACI 318-19 for steel bars embedment and end hooks for anchorage. Force-displacement hysteretic response curves were obtained revealing pinching behavior in the cyclic response. Both types of beams deformed up to maximum chord rotations of 5.22% and 5.73% in case of beams with M14 and M21 concrete, respectively, and experienced cover concrete crushing at the compressed toe. Representative numerical models were assembled implementing fiber-section force-based inelastic beam elements. Additionally, lumped inelastic rotational springs were added to the model for fixed-end rotation. A tri-linear moment-rotation hysteretic response curve has pinching behavior was used to simulate the reduction in re-loading stiffness. This was verified with the measured response of tested beams; excellently simulates the hysteretic response. Moreover, to examine the seismic response of a total structural system regarding these findings, several response history analyses were performed on capacity-designed five-story frames to demonstrate the importance of modeling beam element fixed-end rotation for predicting the story drift demands subjected to different earthquake ground motions. It was found that despite the bar-slip phenomenon the beams developed their yield capacities; however, the response of the frame was subjective depending on the characteristics of input motions, particularly the valleys and hills of the spectral shape.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 240
页数:38
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Effects of high-strength reinforcing bars and concrete on seismic behavior of RC beam-column joints [J].
Aavi-Dehkordi, Sayedmandi ;
Mostofinejad, Davood ;
Alaee, Pooya .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 183 :702-719
[2]  
ACI-ASCE Committee 352 (American Concrete Institute-ASCE Committee 352) ACI-ASCE Committee 352, 2002, 352 ACIASCE
[3]   Seismic Performance Assessment of Non-Compliant SMRF-Reinforced Concrete Frame: Shake-Table Test Study [J].
Ahmad, Naveed ;
Shahzad, Asif ;
Rizwan, Muhammad ;
Khan, Akhtar Naeem ;
Ali, Syed Muhammad ;
Ashraf, Muhammad ;
Naseer, Amjad ;
Ali, Qaisar ;
Alam, Bashir .
JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 23 (03) :444-462
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, INT SOFTW STRUCT AN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, SEISMIC EVALUATION R
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, 3101122006A3 NZS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2019, 31819 ACI
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2004, EN 1992-1-1: 2004
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2005, MODELLING INELASTIC
[10]  
Balazs GL, 1989, BOND SOFTENING REVER, P503