Do not shoot the messenger: ICES advice for an ecosystem approach to fisheries management in the European Union

被引:20
作者
Ballesteros, Marta [1 ,2 ]
Chapela, Rosa [1 ]
Ramirez-Monsalve, Paulina [3 ]
Raakjaer, Jesper [3 ]
Hegland, Troels J. [3 ]
Nielsen, Kare N. [4 ]
Laksa, Unn [5 ]
Degnbol, Poul [3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Tecnol Mar Fundacio CETMAR, Fisheries Socioecon Dept, Eduardo Cabello S-N, Vigo 36208, Spain
[2] Campus Mar,Int Campus Excellence, Vigo, Spain
[3] Aalborg Univ, Innovat Fisheries Management, Rendsburggade 14, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
[4] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Fac Biosci Fisheries & Econ, Tromso, Norway
[5] Syntesa, Fyri Oman Brugv 2, Gota, Faroe Islands, Denmark
关键词
Common Fisheries Policy; ecosystem advice; ecosystem approach to fisheries management; ecosystem-based management; fisheries management; Marine Strategy Framework Directive; IMPLEMENTATION; SCIENCE; POLICY; ASSESSMENTS; INDICATORS; PROGRESS; EU; REGIONALIZATION; STAKEHOLDERS; INTERFACE;
D O I
10.1093/icesjms/fsx181
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) occupies a central role in the advice system to support the implementation of an ecosystem approach to fisheries management (EAFM) in the European Union (EU). Despite improvements, its capacity to deliver ecosystem advice seems to be far from a fully functional operational framework. To what extent availability of appropriate scientific advice is a barrier for a more widespread use of an EAFM in Europe remains an open question. Building on the findings of a large research project, this article explores what advice ICES can provide. The article concludes that: (i) ICES has taken a leading role in generating an EAFM framework in which management decisions can operate; (ii) the advice "suppliers" and the advice "users" agree on the feasibility of using existing knowledge to "do EAFM now"; (iii) ICES can address a range of shortcomings, but some of the present bottlenecks demand concerted action between the advisory system and the political realm. The implementation of an EAFM requires consistency between science and management. ICES appears as well-suited to facilitate the dialogue on applying an EAFM in the EU, but it is unrealistic to expect ICES to produce all the answers.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 530
页数:12
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
AC, 2014, MAREFRAME M ADV COUN
[2]  
[Anonymous], ICES SCI ADV SERV RE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, MARE PUBLICATION SER
[4]   Mismanagement of fisheries:: Policy or science? [J].
Cardinale, Massimiliano ;
Svedang, Henrik .
FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2008, 93 (1-2) :244-247
[5]   Constructing sustainability in EU fisheries: Re-drawing the boundary between science and politics? [J].
Carter, Caitriona A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2013, 30 :26-35
[6]   Stakeholder participation in the management of North East Atlantic pelagic fish stocks: The future role of the Pelagic Regional Advisory Council in a reformed CFP [J].
Coers, Aukje ;
Raakjaer, Jesper ;
Olesen, Christian .
MARINE POLICY, 2012, 36 (03) :689-695
[7]  
Cormier R., 2013, ICES COOPERATIVE RES, V317, P60
[8]   Challenges for Implementing an Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management [J].
Cowan, James H., Jr. ;
Rice, Jake C. ;
Walters, Carl J. ;
Hilborn, Ray ;
Essington, Timothy E. ;
Day, John W., Jr. ;
Boswell, Kevin M. .
MARINE AND COASTAL FISHERIES, 2012, 4 (01) :496-510
[9]   Why the complex nature of integrated ecosystem assessments requires a flexible and adaptive approach [J].
Dickey-Collas, Mark .
ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2014, 71 (05) :1174-1182
[10]   Use of annual catch limits to avoid stock depletion in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands management area (Northeast Pacific) [J].
DiCosimo, Jane ;
Methot, Richard D. ;
Ormseth, Olav A. .
ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2010, 67 (09) :1861-1865