Biomechanical considerations in distraction of the osteotomized dentomaxillary complex

被引:38
作者
Ahn, JG
Figueroa, AA
Braun, S
Polley, JW
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Craniofacial Ctr, Div Plast Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Orthodont, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
[4] Marquette Univ, Milwaukee, WI 53233 USA
[5] Cathol Univ Korea, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70236-2
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The completely osteotomized dentomaxillary complex is essentially a free body constrained only by its soft tissue attachments. Therefore the line of action and point of application of any protractive force(s) used during distraction osteogenesis must be considered relative to its center of mass. This is in contrast to the nonsurgically separated dentomaxillary complex, which is a constrained body, and therefore the application of protractive force(s) must be considered relative to its center of resistance. These two centers are not coincident. With knowledge of the location of the center of mass, predictable protraction of the dentomaxillary complex can be achieved. In this study, the center of mass of an adult maxillary specimen osteotomized to emulate a Le Fort I osteotomy was determined. Protractive force(s) through the center of mass will produce linear advancement along its line of action. Protractive movement of the dentomaxillary complex can be adjusted downward and forward or upward and forward by locating the protractive force(s) line of action superior or inferior to the center of mass. A cleft patient is described wherein the surgically separated dentomaxillary complex is protracted downward and forward with a force vector superior to its approximate center of mass. This results in a predictable increase in overbite and overjet with negligible mandibular rotation.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 270
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy [J].
Baccetti, T ;
McGill, JS ;
Franchi, L ;
McNamara, JA ;
Tollaro, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1998, 113 (03) :333-343
[2]  
Braun S, 1999, ANGLE ORTHOD, V69, P81
[3]   Maxillary-midface distraction in children with cleft lip and palate: A preliminary report [J].
Cohen, SR ;
Burstein, FD ;
Stewart, MB ;
Rathburn, MA .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 99 (05) :1421-1428
[4]   Intraoral distraction for mandibular lengthening: A technical innovation [J].
Diner, PA ;
Kollar, EM ;
Martinez, H ;
Vazquez, MP .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 24 (02) :92-95
[5]   Management of severe cleft maxillary deficiency with distraction osteogenesis: Procedure and results [J].
Figueroa, AA ;
Polley, JW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1999, 115 (01) :1-12
[6]  
Figueroa AA, 1997, INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES, P247
[7]   BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF MAXILLARY PROTRACTION ON THE CRANIOFACIAL COMPLEX [J].
HATA, S ;
ITOH, T ;
NAKAGAWA, M ;
KAMOGASHIRA, K ;
ICHIKAWA, K ;
MATSUMOTO, M ;
CHACONAS, SJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1987, 91 (04) :305-311
[8]  
Hirato R, 1984, J TOKYO DENT COLL, V84, P1225
[9]   TREATMENT EFFECT OF COMBINED MAXILLARY PROTRACTION AND CHINCAP APPLIANCE IN SEVERE SKELETAL CLASS-III CASES [J].
ISHII, H ;
MORITA, S ;
TAKEUCHI, Y ;
NAKAMURA, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1987, 92 (04) :304-312
[10]   Cephalometric effects of face mask expansion therapy in Class III children: A comparison of three age groups [J].
Kapust, AJ ;
Sinclair, PM ;
Turley, PK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1998, 113 (02) :204-212