A comparison of decision-making processes for conventional and complementary medicine in cancer patients
被引:0
作者:
Carmady, Bridget
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Western Sydney, Ctr Complementary Med Res, Penrith, NSW 2751, AustraliaUniv Western Sydney, Ctr Complementary Med Res, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
Carmady, Bridget
[1
]
Smith, Caroline A.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Western Sydney, Ctr Complementary Med Res, Penrith, NSW 2751, AustraliaUniv Western Sydney, Ctr Complementary Med Res, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
Smith, Caroline A.
[1
]
Colagiuri, Ben
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol A18, Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaUniv Western Sydney, Ctr Complementary Med Res, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
Colagiuri, Ben
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Western Sydney, Ctr Complementary Med Res, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol A18, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
To understand the decision-making processes involved in conventional medicine and complementary medicine cancer treatment, and the role that information plays, a cross-sectional survey of cancer patients was carried out at 2 Australian cancer centres. Data was obtained from 75 cancer patients. When asked about complementary medicine use, 36 (48%) patients reported using some form of complementary medicine in conjunction with their conventional treatment. In terms of decision-making, our findings suggest that although cancer patients appear to be at different stages of decision-making for complementary medicine compared with conventional medicine, there was no difference between the decision-making process for cancer patients when it comes to utilising conventional medicine or complementary medicine: patients reported comparable high decisional self-efficacy and low decisional conflict for both areas of medicine. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.