The nursing critical thinking in clinical practice questionnaire for nursing students: A psychometric evaluation study

被引:2
|
作者
Zuriguel-Perez, Esperanza [1 ,2 ,9 ]
Lluch-Canut, Maria-Teresa [3 ]
Puig-Llobet, Montserrat [3 ]
Basco-Prado, Luis [4 ]
Almazor-Sirvent, Adria [5 ]
Biurrun-Garrido, Ainoa [6 ]
Aguayo-Gonzalez, Mariela Patricia [7 ]
Mestres-Soler, Olga [2 ,8 ]
Roldan-Merino, Juan [5 ]
机构
[1] Vall Hebron Univ Hosp, Dept Knowledge Management & Evaluat, Passeig Vall Hebron 119-129, Barcelona 08035, Spain
[2] Vall Hebron Res Inst VHIR, Multidisciplinary Nursing Res Grp, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Barcelona, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, Dept Psychosocial & Mental Hlth Nursing, Carrer Feixa Llarga S-N, Barcelona 08907, Spain
[4] Univ Barcelona, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, Dept Fundamental & Med Surg Nursing, Carrer Feixa Llarga S-N, Barcelona 08907, Spain
[5] Univ Barcelona, Sch Nursing, Dept Mental Hlth Nursing, Campus Docent St Joan Deu, Carrer Miret i Sans 10-16, Barcelona 08034, Spain
[6] Univ Barcelona, Sch Nursing, Campus Docent St Joan Deu, Res Grp Nursing Educ, Carrer Miret i Sans 10-16, Barcelona 08034, Spain
[7] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Fac Med, Res Grp Vulnerability & Hlth GRIVIS, Dept Nursing, Barcelona 08193, Spain
[8] Vall Hebron Univ Hosp, Hosp Nurse Vall Hebron Gen Hosp, Passeig Vall Hebron 119-129, Barcelona 08035, Spain
[9] Vall dHebron Res Inst VHIR Vall dHebron Univ Hos, Head Multidisciplinary Nursing Res Grp, Passeig Vall dHebron 119-129, Barcelona 08035, Spain
关键词
Critical thinking; Instrument; Nursing education; Nursing student; Psychometrics; ABILITY; PERCEPTIONS; GUIDELINES; EDUCATION; JUDGMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103498
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim: To adapt and validate the N-CT-4 Practice for use with Spanish nursing students. Background: Promoting critical thinking is one of the primary objectives of nursing education programs all over the world. Using reliable and valid instruments to measure critical thinking is essential. The Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire (N-CT-4 Practice) is used internationally to assess critical thinking in nursing practice. However, little is known about the possible applications of this instrument in the context of nursing education. Methods: Two-phase study: Phase I, adaptation of the N-CT-4 Practice for use with nursing students and verification of its content validity; phase 2, cross-sectional study to validate its psychometric properties in a sample of 331 nursing students from three university nursing schools. A subsample of 34 students completed the questionnaire on two occasions, with a time interval of two weeks. The construct validity and reliability of the instrument were tested using confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity, internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability. The STROBE guidelines and the COSMIN checklist were followed. Results: All items obtained optimal content validity values. The model fit indices obtained from the confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesis of the four-dimensional structure on which the original questionnaire was based. Cronbach's alpha of 0.96 indicated high reliability. The correlations between the total score and the scores for the dimensions were statistically significant, positive and high, with values above r = 0.78 (p < 0.05). Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.6 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The adapted version of the N-CT-4 Practice is suitable for measuring critical thinking skills in the educational context of the degree course in nursing in Spain. Its psychometric validation yielded satisfactory results.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of Blended Simulation on Nursing Students' Critical Thinking Skills: A Quantitative Study
    Sterner, Anders
    Skold, Robert
    Andersson, Henrik
    SAGE OPEN NURSING, 2023, 9
  • [42] Critical thinking dispositions in baccalaureate nursing students
    Shin, Kyung Rim
    Lee, Ja Hyung
    Ha, Ju Young
    Kim, Kon Hee
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2006, 56 (02) : 182 - 189
  • [43] Life-Threatening Clinical Simulations for Nursing Students: Promoting Critical Thinking and Satisfaction
    Sharon, Cochava
    Green, Gizell
    JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2024, 63 (09) : 595 - 603
  • [44] Identifying Critical Thinking Indicators and Critical Thinker Attributes in Nursing Practice
    Chao, Shu-Yuan
    Liu, Hsing-Yuan
    Wu, Ming-Chang
    Clark, Mary Jo
    Tan, Jung-Ying
    JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2013, 21 (03) : 204 - 210
  • [45] Nursing students' evaluation of quality indicators during learning in clinical practice
    Jansson, Inger
    Ene, Kerstin W.
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2016, 20 : 17 - 22
  • [46] The effect of simulated problem learning in nursing ethics on moral sensitivity, empathy and critical thinking of nursing students: A quasi-experimental study
    Qu, Zhifei
    Sun, Jingjing
    Li, Li
    Zhao, Lijing
    Jiang, Nan
    Fan, Jia
    Zhang, Jiaxin
    Liang, Bing
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2024, 80
  • [47] Final assessment of nursing students in clinical practice: Perspectives of nursing teachers, students and mentors
    Helminen, Kristiina
    Johnson, Martin
    Isoaho, Hannu
    Turunen, Hannele
    Tossavainen, Kerttu
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2017, 26 (23-24) : 4795 - 4803
  • [48] The Outcome-Present State Test Model of Clinical Reasoning to Promote Critical Thinking in Psychiatric Nursing Practice among Nursing Students: A Mixed Research Study
    Ma, Yu-Chin
    Jiang, Jin-Ling
    Lin, Yu-Chuan
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (04)
  • [49] Contribution of students to nursing practice settings during clinical training: Design and validation of a questionnaire
    Fernandez-Feito, Ana
    Garcia-Cueto, Eduardo
    Diaz-Alonso, Julian
    Valcarcel-Alvarez, Yolanda
    Paras-Bravo, Paula
    Andina-Diaz, Elena
    Lana, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2021, 77 (09) : 3940 - 3951
  • [50] The effect of critical thinking education on nursing students' problem-solving skills
    Kanbay, Yalcin
    Okanli, Ayse
    CONTEMPORARY NURSE, 2017, 53 (03) : 313 - 321