Knowledge Tracing Model with Learning and Forgetting Behavior

被引:16
作者
Chen, Mingzhi [1 ]
Guan, Quanlong [2 ]
He, Yizhou [3 ]
He, Zhenyu [1 ]
Fang, Liangda [1 ]
Luo, Weiqi [2 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Technol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Guangdong Inst Smart Educ, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Jinan Univ, Coll Management, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, CIKM 2022 | 2022年
关键词
Educational Data Mining; Knowledge Tracing; Learning and Forgetting;
D O I
10.1145/3511808.3557622
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Knowledge Tracing (KT) task aims to trace the changes of students' knowledge state in real time according to students' historical learning behavior, and predict students' future learning performance. The modern KT models have two problems. One is that these KT models can't reflect students' actual knowledge level. Most KT models only judge students' knowledge state based on their performance in exercises, and poor performance will lead to a decline in knowledge state. However, the essence of students' learning process is the process of acquiring knowledge, which is also a manifestation of learning behavior. Even if they answer the exercises incorrectly, they will still gain knowledge. The other problem is that many KT models don't pay enough attention to the impact of students' forgetting behavior on the knowledge state in the learning process. In fact, learning and forgetting behavior run through students' learning process, and their effects on students' knowledge state shouldn't be ignored. In this paper, based on educational psychology theory, we propose a knowledge tracing model with learning and forgetting behavior (LFBKT). LFBKT comprehensively considers the factors that affect learning and forgetting behavior to build the knowledge acquisition layer, knowledge absorption layer and knowledge forgetting layer. In addition, LFBKT introduces difficulty information to enrich the information of the exercise itself, while taking into account other answering performances besides the answer. Experimental results on two public datasets show that LFBKT can better trace students' knowledge state and outperforms existing models in terms of ACC and AUC.
引用
收藏
页码:3863 / 3867
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Knowledge Tracing with Sequential Key-Value Memory Networks [J].
Abdelrahman, Ghodai ;
Wang, Qing .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 42ND INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGIR CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL (SIGIR '19), 2019, :175-184
[2]   FORGETTING AND THE LEARNING-CURVE - A LABORATORY STUDY [J].
BAILEY, CD .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1989, 35 (03) :340-352
[3]  
Boaler J., 2016, Mistakes grow your brain
[4]   Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology [J].
Ebbinghaus, Hermann .
ANNALS OF NEUROSCIENCES, 2013, 20 (04) :155-156
[5]  
Embretson SE., 2000, Item Response Theory, DOI 10.4324/9781410605269
[6]   Addressing the assessment challenge with an online system that tutors as it assesses [J].
Feng, Mingyu ;
Heffernan, Neil ;
Koedinger, Kenneth .
USER MODELING AND USER-ADAPTED INTERACTION, 2009, 19 (03) :243-266
[7]   Context-Aware Attentive Knowledge Tracing [J].
Ghosh, Aritra ;
Heffernan, Neil ;
Lan, Andrew S. .
KDD '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING, 2020, :2330-2339
[8]  
Glorot X., 2010, P 13 INT C ART INT S, P249
[9]   The significance of dealing with mistakes for student achievement and motivation: results of doubly latent multilevel analyses [J].
Kaefer, Julia ;
Kuger, Susanne ;
Klieme, Eckhard ;
Kunter, Mareike .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2019, 34 (04) :731-753
[10]  
King DB, 2015, ACS SYM SER, V1214, P1, DOI 10.1021/bk-2015-1214.ch001