Predicting L2 learners' noticing of L2 errors: Proficiency, language analytical ability, and interaction mindset

被引:19
作者
Sato, Masatoshi [1 ]
McDonough, Kim [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Andres Bello, Dept English, Fernandez Concha 700, Santiago 7550000, Chile
[2] Concordia Univ, Educ Dept, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Interaction mindset; Noticing of L2 errors; Task-based interaction; Peer corrective feedback; Language analytical ability; Proficiency; CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK; PEER INTERACTION; GRAMMATICAL SENSITIVITY; COLLABORATIVE DIALOGUE; MODIFIED OUTPUT; 2ND-LANGUAGE; NEGOTIATION; PATTERNS; CLOZE; CLASSROOM;
D O I
10.1016/j.system.2020.102301
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The current study explored whether three individual difference variables (proficiency, language analytical ability, and interaction mindset) predict the ways in which second language (L2) speakers report noticing of L2 errors produced by another learner. University-level EFL learners in a teacher training program (N = 102) watched a video in which two L2 speakers carried out a job interview role-play. The interview was scripted so that the job applicant produced 15 errors: five morphosyntactic, five lexical, and five phonological. While watching the video, the pre-service teachers completed a form to give feedback to the job applicant about four dimensions of her performance: appearance and behavior, interest and enthusiasm, content of responses, and language use. They also completed a doze proficiency test, the MLAT analytical ability test, and an interaction mindset questionnaire. Results showed that the learners reported few of the errors that had been scripted into the role-play. A regression model indicated that two subconstructs of interaction mindset (form-orientation and provision of peer feedback) predicted the number of linguistic errors reported. The findings and pedagogical implications are discussed in light of the relevance of interaction mindset to L2 learners' attention to form during task-based interaction. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Adams R., 2007, CONVERSATIONAL INTER, P29
[2]   Explicit and Implicit Feedback, Modified Output, and SLA: Does Explicit and Implicit Feedback Promote Learning and Learner-Learner Interactions? [J].
Adams, Rebecca ;
Nuevo, Ana Maria ;
Egi, Takako .
MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2011, 95 :42-63
[3]  
Ahn S., 2012, Applied Language Learning, V22, P47
[4]   CLOZE PROCEDURE AND PROFICIENCY IN ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN-LANGUAGE [J].
ALDERSON, JC .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 1979, 13 (02) :219-227
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, PRINCIPAL COMPONENT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2019, LANGUAGE AWARENESS, DOI DOI 10.1080/09658416.09652019.01668003
[7]   PERFORMANCE ON CLOZE TESTS WITH FIXED-RATIO AND RATIONAL DELETIONS [J].
BACHMAN, LF .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 1985, 19 (03) :535-556
[8]  
Ballinger S., 2015, Multilingual education, P35
[9]  
Baralt M., 2016, Peer Interaction and second language learning. Pedagogical potential and research agenda, P209, DOI DOI 10.1075/LLLT.45.BAR
[10]  
Brooks L., 2009, MULTIPLE SPECTIVES I, P58