Comparison of nipple projection with the modified double-opposing tab and star flaps

被引:63
作者
Kroll, SS
Reece, GP
Miller, MJ
Evans, GRD
Robb, GL
Baldwin, BJ
Wang, BG
Schusterman, MA
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00006534-199705000-00020
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study compared nipple projection after nipple reconstruction (following breast mound reconstruction) with either the modified double-opposing tab flap or the star flap. Areolar reconstruction and pigmentation of the nipple were achieved with tattooing. Nipple projection for 153 nipples was measured at least 6 months after the reconstruction, when projection was believed to have become stable. Mean follow-up was 2.27 years. In the 106 nipples reconstructed with modified double-opposing tab flaps, the mean projection was 2.4292 mm, while in the 47 nipples reconstructed with star flaps, the mean projection was 1.9681 mm (p = 0.021). We conclude that although both methods are effective, the modified double-opposing tab flap has slightly more projection after approximately 2 years. It is not known, however, whether this is because of reduced nap atrophy or longer initial projection by the modified double-opposing tab flap; further studies are ongoing.
引用
收藏
页码:1602 / 1605
页数:4
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] ANTON MA, 1990, PLAST SURG FORUM, V13, P100
  • [2] NIPPLE RECONSTRUCTION - THE S-FLAP
    CRONIN, ED
    HUMPHREYS, DH
    RUIZRAZURA, A
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1988, 81 (05) : 783 - 787
  • [3] NIPPLE RECONSTRUCTION WITH THE DOUBLE-OPPOSING-TAB FLAP
    KROLL, SS
    HAMILTON, S
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1989, 84 (03) : 520 - 525
  • [4] KROLL SS, 1996, RECONSTRUCTIVE PLAST, P314
  • [5] Little JW, 1987, ADV PLASTIC RECONSTR, V3, P43
  • [6] INTRADERMAL TATTOO AS AN ADJUNCT TO NIPPLE-AREOLA RECONSTRUCTION
    SPEAR, SL
    CONVIT, R
    LITTLE, JW
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1989, 83 (05) : 907 - 911
  • [7] THE S-NIPPLE-AREOLA RECONSTRUCTION
    WEISS, J
    HERMAN, O
    ROSENBERG, L
    SHAFIR, R
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1989, 83 (05) : 904 - 906