The neuroscience of morality and social decision-making

被引:44
作者
Yoder, Keith J. [1 ]
Decety, Jean [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Psychol, 5848 S Univ Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Neurosci, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
Empathy; justice motivation; morality; neuroscience; social decision-making; psychopathy; CRIMINAL PSYCHOPATHS; JUSTICE SENSITIVITY; CINGULATE CORTEX; NEURAL BASIS; EMPATHY; AMYGDALA; TRAITS; JUDGMENTS; BRAIN; PUNISHMENT;
D O I
10.1080/1068316X.2017.1414817
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Across cultures humans care deeply about morality and create institutions, such as criminal courts, to enforce social norms. In such contexts, judges and juries engage in complex social decision-making to ascertain a defendant's capacity, blameworthiness, and culpability. Cognitive neuroscience investigations have begun to reveal the distributed neural networks which interact to implement moral judgment and social decision-making, including systems for reward learning, valuation, mental state understanding, and salience processing. These processes are fundamental to morality, and their underlying neural mechanisms are influenced by individual differences in empathy, caring and justice sensitivity. This new knowledge has important implication in legal settings for understanding how triers of fact reason. Moreover, recent work demonstrates how disruptions within the social decision-making network facilitate immoral behavior, as in the case of psychopathy. Incorporating neuroscientific methods with psychology and clinical neuroscience has the potential to improve predictions of recidivism, future dangerousness, and responsivity to particular forms of rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 295
页数:17
相关论文
共 97 条
  • [1] What's wrong? Moral understanding in psychopathic offenders
    Aharoni, Eyal
    Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter
    Kiehl, Kent A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2014, 53 : 175 - 181
  • [2] Neuroprediction of future rearrest
    Aharoni, Eyal
    Vincent, Gina M.
    Harenski, Carla L.
    Calhoun, Vince D.
    Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter
    Gazzaniga, Michael S.
    Kiehl, Kent A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (15) : 6223 - 6228
  • [3] Neural correlates of moral judgments in first- and third-person perspectives: implications for neuroethics and beyond
    Avram, Mihai
    Hennig-Fast, Kristina
    Bao, Yan
    Poeppel, Ernst
    Reiser, Maximilian
    Blautzik, Janusch
    Giordano, James
    Gutyrchik, Evgeny
    [J]. BMC NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 15
  • [4] The difference of being human: Morality
    Ayala, Francisco J.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 : 9015 - 9022
  • [5] The role of the dorsal striatum in reward and decision-making
    Balleine, Bernard W.
    Delgado, Mauricio R.
    Hikosaka, Okihide
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 27 (31) : 8161 - 8165
  • [6] Psychopathic individuals exhibit but do not avoid regret during counterfactual decision making
    Baskin-Sommers, Arielle
    Stuppy-Sullivan, Allison M.
    Buckholtz, Joshua W.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (50) : 14438 - 14443
  • [7] Batson CD, 2012, SO NEUROSCI SER, P41
  • [8] Baumard N, 2015, MORAL BRAIN: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVE, P35
  • [9] A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice
    Baumard, Nicolas
    Andre, Jean-Baptiste
    Sperber, Dan
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2013, 36 (01) : 59 - 78
  • [10] Baumert A., 2016, HDB SOCIAL JUSTICE T, P161, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0