Exergy based ecological footprint accounting for China

被引：39

作者：

Shao, Ling ^{[1
]}

Wu, Zi ^{[1
]}

Chen, G. Q. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Peking Univ, Coll Engn, State Key Lab Turbulence & Complex Syst, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China

来源：

ECOLOGICAL MODELLING | 2013年 / 252卷

基金：

中国国家自然科学基金;

关键词：

Ecological footprint; Exergy; Resource consumption; RESOURCE ANALYSIS; ENERGY-UTILIZATION; EMBODIED ENERGY; GAS EMISSIONS; NEW-ZEALAND; EMERGY; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSUMPTION; AUSTRIA; EFFICIENCY;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.09.001

中图分类号：

Q14 [生态学（生物生态学）];

学科分类号：

071012 ; 0713 ;

摘要：

The resource consumption of the Chinese society is investigated by ecological footprint (EF) as an aggregate indicator. Based on the theory of ecological thermodynamics, a modified calculation of ecological footprint termed as exergetic ecological footprint (EEF) in contrast to the conventional one is performed and related overall trends of the Chinese society are analyzed. The annual policy for the individual sector is described in detail corresponding to the variations of the EF and EEF components. Comparison of the conventional EF and the EEF is outlined. The EF intensity and EEF intensity are also presented to depict the resource consumption level corresponding to unit economic output. Finally, EEF is suggested to serve as a supplemented indicator of EF towards illustrating the productions of the resource, environment, population, and thereby reflecting the ecological overshoot of the general ecological system. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：83 / 96

页数：14

共 69 条

[41] Ecological footprints and interdependencies of New Zealand regions [J].

McDonald, GW ;

Patterson, MG .

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 50 (1-2) :49-67

[42] Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed - Ecological Footprint and biological capacity assessments [J].

Monfreda, C ;

Wackernagel, M ;

Deumling, D .

LAND USE POLICY, 2004, 21 (03) :231-246

[43] STANDARD CHEMICAL EXERGY OF SOME ELEMENTS AND COMPOUNDS ON THE PLANET EARTH [J].

MORRIS, DR ;

SZARGUT, J .

ENERGY, 1986, 11 (08) :733-755

[44] SUSTAINABILITY, EFFICIENCY, AND GOD - ECONOMIC VALUES AND THE SUSTAINABILITY DEBATE [J].

NELSON, RH .

ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1995, 26 :135-154

[45] Greenhouse gas emissions from building and operating electric power plants in the upper Colorado River Basin [J].

Pacca, S ;

Horvath, A .

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 36 (14) :3194-3200

[46]

Reynolds S.G., 2001, INT S SUST DEV GRASS

[47]

Rosen M.A., 2004, Encyclopedia of Energy, V2, P607, DOI [10.1016/B0-12-176480-X/00129-7, DOI 10.1016/B0-12-176480-X/00129-7]

[48] EVALUATION OF ENERGY-UTILIZATION EFFICIENCY IN CANADA USING ENERGY AND EXERGY ANALYSES [J].

ROSEN, MA .

ENERGY, 1992, 17 (04) :339-350

[49]

Sciubba E., 2004, ENCY ENERGY, P577

[50]

SCIUBBA E, 2001, 4 NTVA SEM IND EC TR

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →