Can radiation therapy treatment planning system accurately predict surface doses in postmastectomy radiation therapy patients?

被引:7
|
作者
Wong, Sharon [1 ]
Back, Michael [2 ]
Tan, Poh Wee [3 ]
Lee, Khai Mun [3 ]
Baggarley, Shaun [3 ]
Lu, Jaide Jay [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore 119077, Singapore
[2] Royal N Shore Hosp, No Sydney Canc Ctr, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
[3] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Inst Canc, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tower Block, Singapore
关键词
Breast phantom; Dosimetry; Tangential irradiation; Absorbed doses; Treatment planning system; IN-VIVO DOSIMETRY; BREAST-CANCER; CHEST-WALL; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; RADIOTHERAPY; IRRADIATION; CARCINOMA; RECURRENCE; PROGRAM; BEAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2011.06.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Skin doses have been an important factor in the dose prescription for breast radiotherapy. Recent advances in radiotherapy treatment techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and new treatment schemes such as hypofractionated breast therapy have made the precise determination of the surface dose necessary. Detailed information of the dose at various depths of the skin is also critical in designing new treatment strategies. The purpose of this work was to assess the accuracy of surface dose calculation by a clinically used treatment planning system and those measured by thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs) in a customized chest wall phantom. This study involved the construction of a chest wall phantom for skin dose assessment. Seven TLDs were distributed throughout each right chest wall phantom to give adequate representation of measured radiation doses. Point doses from the CMS Xio(R) treatment planning system (TPS) were calculated for each relevant TLD positions and results correlated. There were no significant difference between measured absorbed dose by TLD and calculated doses by the TPS (p > 0.05 (1-tailed). Dose accuracy of up to 2.21% was found. The deviations from the calculated absorbed doses were overall larger (3.4%) when wedges and bolus were used. 3D radiotherapy TPS is a useful and accurate tool to assess the accuracy of surface dose. Our studies have shown that radiation treatment accuracy expressed as a comparison between calculated doses (by TPS) and measured doses (by TLD dosimetry) can be accurately predicted for tangential treatment of the chest wall after mastectomy. (C) 2012 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 169
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Simulation of the dose calculation and distribution in radiation Therapy Treatment Planning System
    Machichi, M.
    Oulhouq, Y.
    Rrhioua, A.
    Zerfaoui, M.
    Bakari, D.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2019, 13 : 982 - 990
  • [22] The benefit and risk of postmastectomy radiation therapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer
    Cheng, SH
    Jian, JJM
    Chan, KY
    Tsai, SYC
    Liu, MC
    Chen, CM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1998, 21 (01): : 12 - 17
  • [23] Quantitative Effect of Bolus on Skin Dose in Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy
    Wong, Gina
    Lam, Emily
    Bosnic, Sandi
    Karam, Irene
    Drost, Leah
    Yee, Caitlin
    Ariello, Krista
    Chow, Edward
    Wronski, Matt
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2020, 51 (03) : 462 - 469
  • [24] Are Radiation Target Volumes for Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy Too Large? Initial Report of the Complication Avoidance of Reconstruction Implant Radiation Therapy (CARIT) Study
    Jayatilaka, Aruni
    Lokhandwala, Ashira
    Manouchehri, Kimya
    Brackstone, Muriel
    Lock, Michael
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (02) : 2271 - 2276
  • [25] A System for Continual Quality Improvement of Normal Tissue Delineation for Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning
    Breunig, Jennifer
    Hernandez, Sophy
    Lin, Jeffrey
    Alsager, Stacy
    Dumstorf, Christine
    Price, Jennifer
    Steber, Jennifer
    Garza, Richard
    Nagda, Suneel
    Melian, Edward
    Emami, Bahman
    Roeske, John C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (05): : E703 - E708
  • [26] Tongue surface model can predict radiation tongue mucositis due to intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer
    Musha, A.
    Fukata, K.
    Saitoh, J. -l.
    Shirai, K.
    Abe, T.
    Mizukami, T.
    Kawashima, M.
    Yokoo, S.
    Chikamatsu, K.
    Ohno, T.
    Nakano, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 49 (01) : 44 - 50
  • [27] Impact of Prognostic Factors for Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy of Breast Cancer Patients
    Simonov, K. A.
    Startseva, Zh. A.
    Slonimskaya, E. M.
    Velikaya, V. V.
    PHYSICS OF CANCER: INTERDISCIPLINARY PROBLEMS AND CLINICAL APPLICATIONS (PC IPCA), 2017, 1882
  • [28] A VMAT planning technique for locally advanced breast cancer patients with expander or implant reconstructions requiring comprehensive postmastectomy radiation therapy
    Kuo, LiCheng
    Ballangrud, Ase M.
    Ho, Alice Y.
    Mechalakos, James G.
    Li, Guang
    Hong, Linda
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2019, 44 (02) : 150 - 154
  • [29] Radiation Therapy Can Be Safely Incorporated into Pretransplantation Treatment Regimens for Patients with Multiple Myeloma
    Damron, Ethan P.
    Qazilbash, Muzaffar H.
    Fang, Penny Q.
    Wu, Susan Y.
    Dabaja, Bouthaina S.
    Rondon, Gabriela
    Hosing, Chitra
    Champlin, Richard E.
    Bashir, Qaiser
    Shpall, Elizabeth J.
    Knafl, Mark K.
    Lee, Hans C.
    Manasanch, Elisabet E.
    Patel, Krina
    Thomas, Sheeba K.
    Orlowski, Robert Z.
    Weber, Donna M.
    Pinnix, Chelsea C.
    Gunther, Jillian R.
    TRANSPLANTATION AND CELLULAR THERAPY, 2023, 29 (01): : 37e1 - 37e7
  • [30] Modern Radiation Therapy Planning and Delivery
    Gardner, Stephen J.
    Kim, Joshua
    Chetty, Indrin J.
    HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 33 (06) : 947 - +