Uncertainty-based evaluation and coupling of mathematical and physical models

被引:1
作者
Scheiber, E. [1 ]
Motra, H. B. [2 ]
Legatiuk, D. [1 ]
Werner, F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Bauhaus Univ Weimar, Res Training Grp 1462, Berkaer Str 9, D-99425 Weimar, Germany
[2] Univ Kiel, Marine & Land Geomech & Geotech, Ludewig Meyn Str 10, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[3] Bauhaus Univ Weimar, Chair Steel Struct, Marienstr 7, D-99423 Weimar, Germany
关键词
Model quality; Uncertainty; Mathematical model; Physical model; Weighting factors;
D O I
10.1016/j.probengmech.2016.02.001
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
A procedure for coupling of mathematical and physical models is proposed in this paper. This process is based on a quantification of uncertainties in both models. The procedure allows to determine the influences of uncertainties in mathematical models, as well as in physical models. Moreover, the influences of scattering input parameters in the models are quantified. To assess a global model, the approach for evaluation of models based on the graph theory is applied. By comparing the quantitative model outputs of mathematical and physical models, the coincidence of model responses is shown and assessed. The evaluation of model responses allows a model selection for the coupling process. This process of coupling is based on weighting factors, which are directly related to the model uncertainties. Hence, the model coupling approach gives possibilities to verify the accuracy of used models, and to adopt the coupled model, to be more precise in predicting physical reality. The process of coupling is illustrated by an academic example of the fourth order partial differential equation for a cantilever beam. To create a synthetic model data of a virtual physical model and to validate obtained results, the analytical solution which is based on the Fourier method is used. As an example with real measurements, the model of a torsional loaded steel beam is considered. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 60
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An uncertainty-based quality evaluation tool for nanoindentation systems
    Maculotti, Giacomo
    Genta, Gianfranco
    Galetto, Maurizio
    MEASUREMENT, 2024, 225
  • [2] Uncertainty-based learning of acoustic models from noisy data
    Ozerov, Alexey
    Lagrange, Mathieu
    Vincent, Emmanuel
    COMPUTER SPEECH AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 27 (03) : 874 - 894
  • [3] Uncertainty-based flood resiliency evaluation of wastewater treatment plants
    Karamouz, M.
    Rasoulnia, E.
    Zahmatkesh, Z.
    Olyaei, M. A.
    Baghvand, A.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2016, 18 (06) : 990 - 1006
  • [4] On Measuring Uncertainty and Uncertainty-Based Information: Recent Developments
    George J. Klir
    Richard M. Smith
    Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 2001, 32 : 5 - 33
  • [5] On measuring uncertainty and uncertainty-based information: Recent developments
    Klir, GJ
    Smith, RM
    ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2001, 32 (1-4) : 5 - 33
  • [6] Uncertainty-based evaluation and comparison of SWAT and HSPF applications to the Illinois River Basin
    Xie, Hua
    Lian, Yanqing
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2013, 481 : 119 - 131
  • [7] Uncertainty-Based Selective Clustering for Active Learning
    Hwang, Sekjin
    Choi, Jinwoo
    Choi, Joonsoo
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 110983 - 110991
  • [8] Predictive Uncertainty-based Bias Mitigation in Ranking
    Heuss, Maria
    Cohen, Daniel
    Mansoury, Masoud
    de Rijke, Maarten
    Eickhoff, Carsten
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 32ND ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, CIKM 2023, 2023, : 762 - 772
  • [9] Uncertainty-based Multivariate Time Series Classification
    Zhang X.
    Zhang L.
    Jin B.
    Zhang H.-Z.
    Zidonghua Xuebao/Acta Automatica Sinica, 2023, 49 (04): : 790 - 804
  • [10] Uncertainty-based weight determination for surrogate optimization
    Kim, Doohyun
    Violi, Angela
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2022, 237