Can financial incentives and other nudges increase COVID-19 vaccinations among the vaccine hesitant? A randomized trial

被引:34
作者
Jacobson, Mireille [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Chang, Tom Y. [3 ]
Shah, Manisha [5 ,6 ]
Pramanik, Rajiv [7 ,8 ]
Shah, Samir B. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Leonard Davis Sch Gerontol, 3715 McClintock Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90230 USA
[2] NBER, 3715 McClintock Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90230 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Marshall Sch Business, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Leonard Schaeffer Ctr Hlth Policy & Econ, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Publ Policy, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] NBER, Los Angeles, CA USA
[7] Costa Hlth Serv, Costa Reg Med Ctr, Martinez, CA USA
[8] Costa Hlth Serv, Hlth Ctr, Martinez, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
COVID-19; vaccination; Financial incentives; Public health messages; Vaccine hesitancy; INFLUENZA VACCINATION; CONCORDANCE; INTENTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.060
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Despite rapid initial uptake, COVID-19 vaccinations in the United States stalled within a few months of widespread rollout in 2021. In response, many state and local governments, employers and health sys-tems used public health messaging, financial incentives and creative scheduling tools to increase vaccine uptake. Although these approaches drew on evidence from influenza and other vaccination efforts, they were largely untested in the context of SARS-CoV-2. In mid-2021, months after vaccines were widely available, we evaluated vaccination intentions and vaccine uptake using a randomized control trial. To do this, we recruited unvaccinated members of a Medicaid managed care plan in California (n = 2,701) and randomly assigned them to different public health messages, $10 or $50 financial incentives for vac-cination, a simple vaccination appointment scheduler, or control. While messages increased vaccination intentions, none of the interventions increased vaccination rates. Estimates for financial incentives rule out even relatively small increases in vaccination rates. Small financial incentives and other behavioral nudges do not meaningfully increase COVID-19 vaccination rates amongst the vaccine hesitant.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:6235 / 6242
页数:8
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Implementation of State Vaccine Incentive Lottery Programs and Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccinations in the United States [J].
Acharya, Binod ;
Dhakal, Chandra .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (12)
[2]  
Alsan M., 2021, NBER WORKING PAPER
[3]   Does Diversity Matter for Health? Experimental Evidence from Oakland [J].
Alsan, Marcella ;
Garrick, Owen ;
Graziano, Grant .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 109 (12) :4071-4111
[4]   Emphasize personal health benefits to boost COVID-19 vaccination rates [J].
Ashworth, Madison ;
Thunstrom, Linda ;
Cherry, Todd L. ;
Newbold, Stephen C. ;
Finnoff, David C. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2021, 118 (32)
[5]   Conditional cash lotteries increase COVID-19 vaccination rates [J].
Barber, Andrew ;
West, Jeremy .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2022, 81
[6]   Increasing influenza vaccination rates via low cost messaging interventions [J].
Baskin, Ernest .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (02)
[7]   The Ohio Vaccine Lottery and Starting Vaccination Rates [J].
Brehm, Margaret E. ;
Brehm, Paul A. ;
Saavedra, Martin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2022, 8 (03) :387-411
[8]   Attention, intentions, and follow-through in preventive health behavior: Field experimental evidence on flu vaccination [J].
Bronchetti, Erin Todd ;
Huffman, David B. ;
Magenheim, Ellen .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2015, 116 :270-291
[9]  
Bureau U.S.C., QUICKFACTS
[10]  
California Department of Public Health, 2021, HLTH EQ MUL RES