PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION (EXTENDED vs STANDARD) AND PROSTATE CANCER

被引:7
作者
Rincon, Mayans A. [1 ]
Zudaire, Bergera J. J. [1 ]
Rioja, Zuazu J. [2 ]
Zudaire, Diaz-Tejeiro B.
Barba, Abad J. [1 ]
Brugarolas, Rossello X. [1 ]
Rosell, Costa D. [1 ]
Berian, Polo J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Urol, Pamplona, Spain
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Urol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS | 2008年 / 32卷 / 09期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Lymph node; Lymphadenectomy; Radical prostatectomy;
D O I
10.1016/S0210-4806(08)73955-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The role and the potential benefit, if any, of pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer are still controversially discussed. It is generally accepted that PLND at time of radical prostatectomy is the only reliable diagnostic procedure to achieve as much individual histological staging information as possible to trigger postoperative adjuvant management. However, the extent of pelvic lymph node dissection (limited vs. extended) and the most suitable candidates for this procedure are still a matter of intense debate. The aim of this review is to critically evaluate the current status on lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 887
页数:9
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Algari M, 1997, J UROLOGY, V162, P243
[2]   Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: Impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Allaf, ME ;
Palapattu, GS ;
Trock, BJ ;
Carter, HB ;
Walsh, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (05) :1840-1844
[3]   Comparison of accuracy between the Partin tables of 1997 and 2001 to predict final pathological stage in clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Augustin, H ;
Eggert, T ;
Wenske, S ;
Karakiewicz, PI ;
Palisaar, J ;
Daghofer, F ;
Huland, H ;
Graefen, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (01) :177-181
[4]   EAU guidelines on prostate cancer [J].
Aus, G ;
Abbou, CC ;
Bolla, M ;
Heidenreich, A ;
Schmid, HP ;
van Poppel, H ;
Wolff, J ;
Zattoni, F .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 48 (04) :546-551
[5]   Is a limited lymph node dissection an adequate staging procedure for prostate cancer? [J].
Bader, P ;
Burkhard, FC ;
Markwalder, R ;
Studer, UE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (02) :514-518
[6]   Disease progression and survival of patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy. Is there a chance of cure? [J].
Bader, P ;
Burkhard, FC ;
Markwalder, R ;
Studer, UE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (03) :849-854
[7]   No difference in six-year biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in lowrisk patients with localized prostate cancer [J].
Bhatta-Dhar, N ;
Reuther, AM ;
Zippe, C ;
Klein, EA .
UROLOGY, 2004, 63 (03) :528-531
[8]   Validation of Partin tables for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Blute, ML ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Partin, AW ;
Walsh, PC ;
Kattan, MW ;
Scardino, PT ;
Montie, JE ;
Pearson, JD ;
Slezak, JM ;
Zincke, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (05) :1591-1595
[9]   Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era [J].
Boorjian, Stephen A. ;
Thompson, R. Houston ;
Siddiqui, Sameer ;
Bagniewski, Stephanie ;
Bergstralh, Erik J. ;
Karnes, R. Jeffrey ;
Frank, Igor ;
Blute, Michael L. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (03) :864-870
[10]   Limited pelvic lymphadenectomy using the sentinel lymph node procedure in patients with localised prostate carcinoma: a pilot study [J].
Brenot-Rossi, I ;
Bastide, C ;
Garcia, S ;
Dumas, S ;
Esterni, B ;
Pasquier, J ;
Rossi, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2005, 32 (06) :635-640