Religious perspectives on withdrawal of treatment from patients with multiple organ failure

被引:13
作者
Ankeny, RA
Clifford, R
Jordens, CFC
Kerridge, IH
Benson, R
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Unit Hist & Philosophy Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Ctr Values Eth & Law Med, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Unit Hist & Philoscopy Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Morling Theolog Coll, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb00053.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Religious or spiritual values often influence health care decision-making by patients and their families, particularly in times of crisis. Though religious values might seem to be irrelevant where continuing treatment is judged to be "futile", such clinical assessments should instead serve to open a dialogue about values and beliefs. The six major religious traditions in Australia have some similar values and principles about death and provision of care for the dying, but differ in their processes of ethical reasoning, cosmologies, and key moral concepts. Engaging with religious traditions on the common ground of basic values (such as human dignity, care, the sacredness of human life, non-violence, compassion, and selflessness) promotes negotiation of the manner in which care is provided, even where conflicts exist.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / +
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
ABRAHAM AS, NISHMAT AVRAHAM YORE, V339, P4
[2]  
AUERBACH SZ, 1980, JEWISH BIOETHICS, P275
[3]  
BLEICH JD, 1995, CONT HALACHIC PROBLE, V4
[4]  
CARO J, SHULCHAN ARUCH ORECH, V329, P2
[5]  
Catholic Health Australia, 2001, COD ETH STAND CATH H
[6]  
DAWOOD NJ, 1999, KORAN NEW TRANSLATIO
[7]   Medical ethics and Islam: principles and practice [J].
Gatrad, AR ;
Sheikh, A .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2001, 84 (01) :72-75
[8]  
JOHNPAUL, 1995, EVANGELIUM VITAE ENC
[9]  
JORDENS JTF, 1998, GANDHIS RELIG HOMESP, P228
[10]  
MAIMONIDES M, MISHNEH TORAH LAWS M, V4, P5