The effects of activating prior topic and metacognitive knowledge on text comprehension scores

被引:27
作者
Kostons, Danny [1 ]
van der Werf, Greetje [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Groninger Inst Educ Res, NL-9712 TG Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
text comprehension; prior knowledge activation; metacognition; READING-COMPREHENSION; STRATEGIES; JUDGMENTS; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1111/bjep.12069
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Background Research on prior knowledge activation has consistently shown that activating learners' prior knowledge has beneficial effects on learning. If learners activate their prior knowledge, this activated knowledge serves as a framework for establishing relationships between the knowledge they already possess and new information provided to them. Thus far, prior knowledge activation has dealt primarily with topic knowledge in specific domains. Students, however, likely also possess at least some metacognitive knowledge useful in those domains, which, when activated, should aid in the deployment of helpful strategies during reading. Aims In this study, we investigated the effects of both prior topic knowledge activation (PTKA) and prior metacognitive knowledge activation (PMKA) on text comprehension scores. Samples & Methods Eighty-eight students in primary education were randomly distributed amongst the conditions of the 2x2 (PTKA yes/no x PMKA yes/no) designed experiment. Results Results show that activating prior metacognitive knowledge had a beneficial effect on text comprehension, whereas activating prior topic knowledge, after correcting for the amount of prior knowledge, did not. Conclusions Most studies deal with explicit instruction of metacognitive knowledge, but our results show that this may not be necessary, specifically in the case of students who already have some metacognitive knowledge. However, existing metacognitive knowledge needs to be activated in order for students to make better use of this knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 275
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   A perspective on strategy research: Progress and prospects [J].
Alexander, PA ;
Graham, S ;
Harris, KR .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1998, 10 (02) :129-154
[2]   PRIOR KNOWLEDGE ACTIVATION AND THE COMPREHENSION OF COMPATIBLE AND INCOMPATIBLE TEXT [J].
ALVERMANN, DE ;
SMITH, LC ;
READENCE, JE .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1985, 20 (04) :420-436
[3]   Effects of prior knowledge and concept-map structure on disorientation, cognitive load, and learning [J].
Amadieu, Franck ;
van Gog, Tamara ;
Paas, Fred ;
Tricot, Andre ;
Marine, Claudette .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2009, 19 (05) :376-386
[4]  
CHI MTH, 1994, COGNITIVE SCI, V18, P439, DOI 10.1016/0364-0213(94)90016-7
[5]  
Cohen J., 2013, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
[6]   Effects of problem-based discussion on studying a subsequent text: A randomized trial among first year medical students [J].
De Grave, WS ;
Schmidt, HG ;
Boshuizen, HPA .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2001, 29 (01) :33-44
[7]   How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes [J].
Dignath, Charlotte ;
Buettner, Gerhard ;
Langfeldt, Hans-Peter .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2008, 3 (02) :101-129
[8]   What are confidence judgments made of? Students' explanations for their confidence ratings and what that means for calibration [J].
Dinsmore, Daniel L. ;
Parkinson, Meghan M. .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2013, 24 :4-14
[9]   Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta-analysis [J].
Donker, A. S. ;
de Boer, H. ;
Kostons, D. ;
van Ewijk, C. C. Dignath ;
van der Werf, M. P. C. .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2014, 11 :1-26
[10]   META-COGNITION AND COGNITIVE MONITORING - NEW AREA OF COGNITIVE-DEVELOPMENTAL INQUIRY [J].
FLAVELL, JH .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1979, 34 (10) :906-911