共 50 条
Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
被引:62
作者:
Lee, Todd C.
[1
,2
,3
]
Murthy, Srinivas
[4
]
Del Corpo, Olivier
[5
]
Senecal, Julien
[5
]
Butler-Laporte, Guillaume
[3
]
Sohani, Zahra N.
[1
]
Brophy, James M.
[3
,6
]
McDonald, Emily G.
[2
,7
]
机构:
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Clin Practice Assessment Unit, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol Occupat Hlth & Biostat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Dept Pediat, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[7] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金:
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词:
Coronavirus;
COVID-19;
Meta;
-analysis;
Mortality;
Remdesivir;
D O I:
10.1016/j.cmi.2022.04.018
中图分类号:
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号:
100401 ;
摘要:
Background: The benefits of remdesivir in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 remain debated with the National Institutes of Health and the World Health Organization providing contradictory recommendations for and against use. Objectives: To evaluate the role of remdesivir for hospitalized inpatients as a function of oxygen requirements. Data sources: Beginning with our prior systematic review, we searched MEDLINE using PubMed from 15 January 2021 through 5 May 2022. Study eligibility criteria: Randomised controlled trials; all languages. Participants: All hospitalized adults with COVID-19. Interventions: Remdesivir, in comparison to either placebo, or standard of care. Assessment of risk of bias: We used the ROB-2 criteria. Methods of data synthesis: The primary outcome was mortality, stratified by oxygen use (none, supplemental oxygen without mechanical ventilation, and mechanical ventilation). We conducted a frequentist random effects meta-analysis on the risk ratio scale and, to contextualize the probabilistic benefits, we also performed a Bayesian random effects meta-analysis on the risk difference scale. A >= 1% absolute risk reduction was considered clinically important. Results: We identified eight randomized trials, totaling 10 751 participants. The risk ratio for mortality comparing remdesivir vs. control was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.5-1.19) in the patients who did not require supplemental oxygen; 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79-0.99) for nonventilated patients requiring oxygen; and 1.08 (95% CI, 0.88-1.31) in the setting of mechanical ventilation. Using neutral priors, the probabilities that remdesivir reduces mortality were 76.8%, 93.8%, and 14.7%, respectively. The probability that remdesivir reduced mortality by >= 1% was 77.4% for nonventilated patients requiring oxygen. Conclusions: Based on this meta-analysis, there is a high probability that remdesivir reduces mortality for nonventilated patients with COVID-19 requiring supplemental oxygen therapy. Treatment guidelines should be re-evaluated. Todd C. Lee, Clin Microbiol Infect 2022;28:1203 (c) 2022 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1203 / 1210
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条