Centrifuge modeling of steel catenary risers at touchdown zone part II: Assessment of centrifuge test results using kaolin clay

被引:27
作者
Elliott, Bradley J. [1 ,2 ]
Zakeri, Arash [1 ,3 ]
Barrett, John [1 ]
Hawlader, Bipul [2 ]
Li, George [4 ]
Clukey, Edward C. [3 ]
机构
[1] C CORE, St John, NF, Canada
[2] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, St John, NF A1B 3X5, Canada
[3] BP Amer, Houston, TX USA
[4] Shell Int Explorat & Prod Inc, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Steel catenary riser (SCR); Touchdown zone; Fatigue; Riser-soil interaction; Centrifuge modeling;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.11.013
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
This paper presents the results of an experimental investigation into the fatigue issues related to steel catenary risers (SCRs) within the Touchdown Zone (TDZ). The experiment was conducted in the C-CORE geotechnical centrifuge using the apparatus described in Part I (the companion paper). Kaolin clay with an undrained shear strength profile typical of deepwater Gulf of Mexico was used for the model seabed. The model riser simulated an approximately 108 m long, 0.5 m diameter SCR subjected to four sets of synthetic heave and surge motions ranging in complexity from a simple sinusoidal wave to those having characteristics of dual frequency Response-Amplitude-Operator (RAO) motions. The results provided valuable insights into the fluid-riser-soil interaction mechanism, trench formation and its influence on the fatigue stresses of an SCR. The results indicated that the trench geometry had a significant influence on the fatigue stresses. The formation of the trench in this experimental program resulted in considerable reduction (as high as about 20%) in bending and tensile fatigue stresses. The experimental program demonstrated that the fatigue life of an SCR could potentially increase as the trench developed from its original mudline state. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 218
页数:11
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
ABS, 2001, GUID BUILD CLASS SUB, P205
[2]  
Aubeny C.P., 2009, International Journal of Geomechanics, V9, P133
[3]  
Elliott B. J., OCEAN ENG
[4]  
Finnie I.M. S., 1994, 7 INT C BEHAVIOUR OF, P217
[5]  
Giertsen E., 2004, ASME 2004 23 INT C O, P633
[6]   Rate effects on penetrometer resistance in kaolin [J].
Lehane, B. M. ;
O'Loughlin, C. D. ;
Gaudin, C. ;
Randolph, M. F. .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 2009, 59 (01) :41-52
[7]  
Leira B. J., 2004, ASME 2004 23 INT C O, P955
[8]  
Shiri H, 2010, P ASME 2010 29 INT C