Expert and novice problem solving strategies in chess: Sixty years of citing de Groot (1946)

被引：21

作者：

Bilalic, Merim ^{[1
]}

McLeod, Peter ^{[1
]}

Gobet, Fernand ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, England

[2] Brunel Univ, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England

来源：

THINKING & REASONING | 2008年 / 14卷 / 04期

基金：

英国经济与社会研究理事会;

关键词：

Chess; Experts vs novices; Expertise; Problem solving; Scientific citation; Search; Thinking;

D O I：

10.1080/13546780802265547

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

In a famous study of expert problem solving, de Groot (1946/1978) examined how chess players found the best move. He reported that there was little difference in the way that the best players (Grand Masters) and very good players (Candidate Masters) searched the board. Although this result has been regularly cited in studies of expertise, it is frequently misquoted. It is often claimed that de Groot found no difference in the way that experts and novices investigate a problem. Comparison of expert and novice chess players on de Groot's problem shows that there are clear differences in their search patterns. We discuss the troublesome theoretical and practical consequences of incorrectly reporting de Groot's findings.

引用

页码：395 / 408

页数：14

共 39 条

[11]

De Groot A. D., 1978, Thought and choice in chess

[12]

Dreyfus HL., 1986, MIND MACHINE

[13]

DREYFUS SE, 1980, 802 ORC U CAL OP RES

[14]

Elo A.E., 1978, The Rating of Chessplayers: Past and Present