Identification of failure mechanisms of metallised glass fibre reinforced composites under tensile loading using acoustic emission analysis

被引:26
作者
Njuhovic, E. [1 ]
Braeu, M. [1 ]
Wolff-Fabris, F. [2 ]
Starzynski, K. [3 ]
Altstaedt, V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bayreuth, Dept Polymer Engn, D-95447 Bayreuth, Germany
[2] SKZ KFE gGmbH, D-95100 Selb, Germany
[3] Lilberg Elekt GmbH & Co Rothfischer KG, D-92637 Weiden, Germany
关键词
Glass fibres; Thermosetting resin; Acoustic emission; Adhesion; Metallisation; COATINGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.018
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this work, failure mechanisms of metallised glass fibre reinforced epoxy composites under tensile loading were investigated using acoustic emission analysis. Sandblasting with Al2O3 was used to pre-treat the composite surface prior to metallisation, and therefore to improve adhesion. The sandblasting time was varied from 2 s to 6 s. A two-step metallisation process consisting of electroless and subsequent electroplating was used for depositing the copper coating on the pre-treated composite surface. The mechanical pre-treatment had no significant negative effect on the mechanical properties of the composite laminate. The acoustic emission (AE) from the metallised composite was recorded during tensile testing in order to investigate the failure mechanisms. AE-Signals were analysed using pattern recognition and frequency analysis techniques. A correlation between the cumulative absolute AE-energy and the mechanical behaviour of uncoated and coated specimens during tensile testing was successfully observed. It was shown that a stronger adhesion between substrate and coating leads to a lower release of mechanical elastic energy, which could be recorded by means of AE analysis. Furthermore, differences in peak frequency, frequency distribution and the use of pattern recognition techniques allowed classifying the signal into three failure mechanisms for the uncoated samples and four failure mechanisms for the coated samples, namely matrix cracking, fibre-matrix interface failure, fibre breakage and substrate-coating interface failure. Waveform and frequency analysis of the classified signals supported the identification of the failure mechanisms. Furthermore, optical investigation and SEM images of the tested samples and fracture surfaces confirmed the identified mechanisms evaluated by acoustic emission analysis. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
AEwin Software, 2007, AEWIN SOFTW US MAN
[2]  
Anastassopoulos A. A., 1995, Journal of Acoustic Emission, V13, P11
[3]  
Anastassopoulos AA, 2000, P 15 WORLD C NDT ROM
[4]  
[Anonymous], J ACOUST EMISSION
[5]   Acoustic emission testing of high-pressure composite cylinders [J].
Bohse, J. ;
Mair, G. W. ;
Novak, P. .
ACOUSTIC EMISSION TESTING, 2006, 13-14 :267-+
[6]   Acoustic emission characteristics of micro-failure processes in polymer blends and composites [J].
Bohse, J .
COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 60 (08) :1213-1226
[7]  
Bohse J, 1998, PROG ACOUST EMISS, V9, P343
[8]  
Bohse J., 2000, Eur Struct Integr Soc, V27, P15, DOI [10.1016/S1566-1369(00)80004-7, DOI 10.1016/S1566-1369(00)80004-7]
[9]  
Bohse J, 2001, J ACOUST EMISS, V19
[10]  
Boshe J., 2004, J ACOUST EMISSION, V22, P208