Estimation of electronic coupling in π-stacked donor-bridge-acceptor systems:: Correction of the two-state model -: art. no. 064505

被引:76
作者
Voityuk, AA
机构
[1] Inst Catalana Recerca & Estudis Avancats, Barcelona 08010, Spain
[2] Univ Girona, Int Computat Chem, Girona 17071, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.2166232
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Comparison of donor-acceptor electronic couplings calculated within two-state and three-state models suggests that the two-state treatment can provide unreliable estimates of V-da because of neglecting the multistate effects. We show that in most cases accurate values of the electronic coupling in a pi stack, where donor and acceptor are separated by a bridging unit, can be obtained as V-da=(E-2-E-1)mu(12)/R-da+(2E(3)-E-1-E-2)2 mu(13)mu(23)/R-da(2), where E-1, E-2, and E-3 are adiabatic energies of the ground, charge-transfer, and bridge states, respectively, mu(ij) is the transition dipole moments between the states i and j, and R-da is the distance between the planes of donor and acceptor. In this expression based on the generalized Mulliken-Hush approach, the first term corresponds to the coupling derived within a two-state model, whereas the second term is the superexchange correction accounting for the bridge effect. The formula is extended to bridges consisting of several subunits. The influence of the donor-acceptor energy mismatch on the excess charge distribution, adiabatic dipole and transition moments, and electronic couplings is examined. A diagnostic is developed to determine whether the two-state approach can be applied. Based on numerical results, we showed that the superexchange correction considerably improves estimates of the donor-acceptor coupling derived within a two-state approach. In most cases when the two-state scheme fails, the formula gives reliable results which are in good agreement (within 5%) with the data of the three-state generalized Mulliken-Hush model. (c) 2006 American Institute of Physics.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Pathways for photoinduced charge separation in DNA hairpins [J].
Beljonne, D ;
Pourtois, G ;
Ratner, MA ;
Brédas, JL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 125 (47) :14510-14517
[2]   DNA electron transfer processes: Some theoretical notions [J].
Berlin, YA ;
Kurnikov, IV ;
Beratan, D ;
Ratner, MA ;
Burin, AL .
LONG-RANGE CHARGE TRANSFER IN DNA II, 2004, 237 :1-36
[3]   Generalization of the Mulliken-Hush treatment for the calculation of electron transfer matrix elements [J].
Cave, RJ ;
Newton, MD .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1996, 249 (1-2) :15-19
[4]   Calculation of electronic coupling matrix elements for ground and excited state electron transfer reactions: Comparison of the generalized Mulliken-Hush and block diagonalization methods [J].
Cave, RJ ;
Newton, MD .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 106 (22) :9213-9226
[5]   From valence trapped to valence delocalized by bridge state modification in bis(triarylamine) radical cations: Evaluation of coupling matrix elements in a three-level system [J].
Lambert, C ;
Amthor, S ;
Schelter, J .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2004, 108 (31) :6474-6486
[7]   The nature of tunnel splitting mediated by stacked aromatics [J].
Lee, MK ;
Shephard, MJ ;
Risser, SM ;
Priyadarshy, S ;
Paddon-Row, MN ;
Beratan, DN .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2000, 104 (32) :7593-7599
[8]   Photoinduced charge generation and recombination dynamics in model donor/acceptor pairs for organic solar cell applications:: A full quantum-chemical treatment [J].
Lemaur, V ;
Steel, M ;
Beljonne, D ;
Brédas, JL ;
Cornil, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 127 (16) :6077-6086
[9]   QUANTUM CHEMICAL PROBES OF ELECTRON-TRANSFER KINETICS - THE NATURE OF DONOR-ACCEPTOR INTERACTIONS [J].
NEWTON, MD .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 1991, 91 (05) :767-792
[10]   Control of electron transfer kinetics: Models for medium reorganization and donor-acceptor coupling [J].
Newton, MD .
ELECTRON TRANSFER-FROM ISOLATED MOLECULES TO BIOMOLECULES, PT 1, 1999, 106 :303-375