Predictors of Range of Motion in Patients Undergoing Manipulation After TKA

被引:55
作者
Bawa, Harpreet S. [1 ]
Wera, Glenn D. [1 ]
Kraay, Matthew J. [1 ]
Marcus, Randall E. [1 ]
Goldberg, Victor M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Univ Hosp, Case Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; CONTINUOUS PASSIVE MOTION; TOTAL HIP; STIFFNESS; FLEXION; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; RELIABILITY; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-012-2591-1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Knee stiffness or limited range of motion (ROM) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may compromise patient function. Patients with stiffness are usually managed with manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) to improve ROM. However, the final ROM obtained is multifactorial and may depend on factors such as comorbidities, implant type, or the timing of MUA. We asked whether diabetes mellitus, implant type, and the interval between TKA and MUA influenced post-MUA ROM. From a group of 2462 patients with 3224 TKAs performed between 1999 and 2007 we retrospectively reviewed 96 patients with 119 TKAs (4.3%) who underwent MUA. We determined the presence of diabetes mellitus, implant type, and the interval between TKA and MUA. The average increase in ROM after MUA was 34A degrees. Patients with diabetes mellitus experienced lower final ROM after MUA (87.5A degrees versus 100.3A degrees) as did patients with cruciate-retaining (CR) prostheses versus posterior-stabilized (92.3A degrees versus 101.6A degrees). The interval between TKA and MUA inversely correlated with final ROM with a decrease after 75 days. Most patients experience improvements in ROM after MUA. Patients with diabetes mellitus or CR prostheses are at risk for lower final ROM after MUA. Manipulation within 75 days of TKA is associated with better ROM. Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 263
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Poor outcomes of isolated tibial insert exchange and arthrolysis for the management of stiffness following total knee arthroplasty [J].
Babis, GC ;
Trousdale, RT ;
Pagnano, MW ;
Morrey, BF .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A (10) :1534-1536
[2]   The impact of diabetes on perioperative patient outcomes after total hip and total knee arthroplasty in the United States [J].
Bolognesi, Michael P. ;
Marchant, Milford H., Jr. ;
Viens, Nicholas A. ;
Cook, Chad ;
Pietrobon, Ricardo ;
Vail, Thomas Parker .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2008, 23 (06) :92-98
[3]   Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty [J].
Bong, MR ;
Di Cesare, PE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2004, 12 (03) :164-171
[4]   Intra- and intertester reliability and criterion validity of the parallelogram and universal goniometers for measuring maximum active knee flexion and extension of patients with knee restrictions [J].
Brosseau, L ;
Balmer, S ;
Tousignant, M ;
O'Sullivan, JP ;
Goudreault, C ;
Goudreault, M ;
Gringras, S .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2001, 82 (03) :396-402
[5]   Knee Range of Motion During the First Two Years After Use of Posterior Cruciate-Stabilizing or Posterior Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Prostheses A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Chaudhary, R. ;
Beaupre, L. A. ;
Johnston, D. W. C. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (12) :2579-2586
[6]   Revision of the stiff total knee arthroplasty [J].
Christensen, CP ;
Crawford, JJ ;
Olin, MD ;
Vail, TP .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (04) :409-415
[7]  
Coutts R D, 1994, Contemp Orthop, V28, P523
[8]  
Coutts RD, 1994, CONT ORTHOP, V28, P541
[9]  
Daluga D, 1991, J Arthroplasty, V6, P119, DOI 10.1016/S0883-5403(11)80006-9
[10]   Manipulation of total knee replacements - Is the flexion gained retained? [J].
Esler, CNA ;
Lock, K ;
Harper, WM ;
Gregg, PJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1999, 81B (01) :27-29