Comparison of Fuzzy AHP Algorithms for Land Suitability Assessment

被引:4
作者
Caha, Jan [1 ]
Burian, Jaroslav [2 ]
机构
[1] Mendel Univ Brno, Fac Reg Dev & Int Studies, Dept Reg Dev & Publ Adm, Zemedelska 1, Brno 61300, Czech Republic
[2] Palacky Univ Olomouc, Dept Geoinformat, Fac Sci, 17 Listopadu 50, Olomouc 77146, Czech Republic
来源
DYNAMICS IN GISCIENCE | 2018年
关键词
Fuzzy AHP; Analytical hierarchy process; Multiple criteria; Decision-making; Land suitability; GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; EXTENT ANALYSIS METHOD; GIS;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-61297-3_3
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) is one of the most popular methods for Multiple Criteria Decision-making (MCDM) in the field of geoinformatics. A typical utilization of WLC is in land suitability assessment and optimal location detection. The application of WLC requires the determination of weights for each criterion used in the MCDM problem. In this paper, we focus on a fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) which is based on pairwise comparisons of criterion importance and, unlike the classic (crisp) AHP, it can contain uncertainty. This allows the user to include imprecise or incomplete knowledge in an MCDM problem. The theoretical part of the paper briefly describes fuzzy AHP and provides the necessary mathematical background. The practical part of the contribution is focused on testing two algorithms for weight determination in fuzzy AHP-the extent analysis method and a method based on constrained fuzzy arithmetic. The methods are described in terms of the amount of uncertainty in the result, the resulting value, and overall appropriateness. A four level fuzzy AHP problem containing one main goal, three criteria and twenty-four subcriteria is solved as a case study using both methods. Based on the results obtained, the recommendations for fuzzy AHP utilization in spatial suitability assessment are made.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 46
页数:16
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, APPL FUZZY ARITHMETI
[2]   FUZZINESS IN GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION-SYSTEMS - CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
BANAI, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1993, 7 (04) :315-329
[3]   Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices [J].
Barzilai, J .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1997, 48 (12) :1226-1232
[4]   Analytical material for planning in Olomouc, Czech Republic [J].
Burian, Jaroslav ;
Brychtova, Alzbeta ;
Vavra, Ales ;
Hladisova, Barbora .
JOURNAL OF MAPS, 2016, 12 (04) :649-654
[5]  
Burian J, 2015, GEOGRAFIE-PRAGUE, V120, P330
[6]  
Caha J., 2016, EXAMPLES FUZZYAHP PA
[7]   GIS-based analytic hierarchy process as a multicriteria decision analysis instrument: a review [J].
Chandio, Imtiaz Ahmed ;
Matori, Abd Nasir B. ;
WanYusof, Khamaruzaman B. ;
Talpur, Mir Aftab Hussain ;
Balogun, Abdul-Lateef ;
Lawal, Dano Umar .
ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2013, 6 (08) :3059-3066
[8]   Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP [J].
Chang, DY .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) :649-655
[9]  
Du X., 2016, ARABIAN J GEOSCIENCE, V9
[10]   A Comparison of Fuzzy AHP and Ideal Point Methods for Evaluating Land Suitability [J].
Elaalem, Mukhtar ;
Comber, Alexis ;
Fisher, Pete .
TRANSACTIONS IN GIS, 2011, 15 (03) :329-346