Development of the Flame Test Concept Inventory: Measuring Student Thinking about Atomic Emission

被引:19
作者
Bretz, Stacey Lowery [1 ]
Mayo, Ana Vasquez Murata [1 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Dept Chem & Biochem, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
High School/Introductory Chemistry; First-Year Undergraduate/General; Upper-Division Undergraduate; Analytical Chemistry; Chemical Education Research; Demonstrations; Misconceptions/Discrepant Events; Testing/Assessment; Atomic Spectroscopy; Atomic Properties/Structure; CHOICE DIAGNOSTIC INSTRUMENT; ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTIONS; PARTICULATE NATURE; CONTENT MAP; MISCONCEPTIONS; DEMONSTRATIONS; UNDERSTANDINGS; MEANINGFUL; EDUCATION; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00594
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
This study reports the development of a 19-item Flame Test Concept Inventory, an assessment tool to measure students' understanding of atomic emission. Fifty-two students enrolled in secondary and postsecondary chemistry courses were interviewed about atomic emission and explicitly asked to explain flame test demonstrations and energy level diagrams. Analysis of students' explanations offered insight into students' alternative conceptions and was used to design items and distractors for a 19-item Flame Test Concept Inventory about atomic emission. Results from a pilot study with first-year university chemistry and with upper-division chemistry students were analyzed to create a final version of the inventory that was administered to both secondary students (N = 459) and first-year university students (N = 100) who had completed formal instruction and course assessment about atomic emission. Analysis of student responses indicated the inventory generated valid and reliable data. Common alternative conceptions about atomic emission that remain postinstruction and their prevalence are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 27
页数:11
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   An analysis of 16-17-year-old students' understanding of solution chemistry concepts using a two-tier diagnostic instrument [J].
Adadan, Emine ;
Savasci, Funda .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2012, 34 (04) :513-544
[2]   Development and Validation of Instruments to Measure Learning of Expert-Like Thinking [J].
Adams, Wendy K. ;
Wieman, Carl E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2011, 33 (09) :1289-1312
[3]   VIVID FLAME TESTS [J].
AGER, DJ ;
EAST, MB ;
MILLER, RA ;
SCHILT, AA .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 1988, 65 (06) :545-546
[4]  
Anderson H, 1947, J CHEM EDUC, V24, P443
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, KNOWING WHAT STUDENT, V19, P48, DOI DOI 10.17226/10019
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1973, Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief
[7]   Thai Grade 11 students' alternative conceptions for acid-base chemistry [J].
Artdej, Romklao ;
Ratanaroutai, Thasaneeya ;
Coll, Richard Kevin ;
Thongpanchang, Tienthong .
RESEARCH IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 28 (02) :167-183
[8]  
Ausubel DP., 1978, ED PSYCHOL COGNITIVE, V6
[9]   MISCONCEPTIONS OF STUDENTS AND TEACHERS IN CHEMICAL-EQUILIBRIUM [J].
BANERJEE, AC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 1991, 13 (04) :487-494
[10]   An improved method for students' flame pests in qualitative analysis [J].
Bare, WD ;
Bradley, T ;
Pulliam, E .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 1998, 75 (04) :459-459