Therapeutic misconception, misestimation, and optimism in participants enrolled in phase 1 trials

被引:109
作者
Pentz, Rebecca D. [1 ]
White, Margaret [2 ]
Harvey, R. Donald [1 ]
Farmer, Zachary Luke [3 ]
Liu, Yuan [4 ]
Lewis, Colleen [5 ]
Dashevskaya, Olga [6 ]
Owonikoko, Taofeek [1 ]
Khuri, Fadlo R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hematol & Med Oncol, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ Sch Med, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Med Sch Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[4] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[5] Emory Healthcare, Dept Hematol & Med Oncol, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Inst Review Board, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
ethics; therapeutic misconception; informed consent; clinical trials; phase; 1; I CLINICAL-TRIALS; INFORMED-CONSENT; ONCOLOGY RESEARCH; BENEFIT; EXPECTATIONS; MOTIVATION; DISEASE; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.27397
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Ethical concerns about phase 1 trials persist. Important conceptual advances have been made in understanding concepts used to describe misunderstanding. However, a systematic, empirical evaluation of the frequency of misunderstanding incorporating recent developments is lacking. METHODS: The authors queried 95 participants in phase 1 trials to provide a more sophisticated estimate of the proportion who had therapeutic misconception (TM), defined as misunderstanding the research purpose or how research differs from individualized care, and therapeutic misestimation (TMis), defined as incorrectly estimating the chance of a research trial benefit as >20% or underestimating risk as 0%. RESULTS: Sixty-five of 95 respondents (68.4%) had TM, which was associated in a multivariate analysis with lower education and family income (P = .008 and P = .001, respectively), but TM was not associated with the vulnerability of having hardly any treatment options. Eighty-nine of 95 respondents (94%) had TMis, although only 18% reported this was a factual estimate. Although the risks of investigational agents and those exacerbated by research, such as uncertain outcomes, were mentioned (39% and 41% of respondents, respectively), risks novel to research, such as research biopsies, were rarely mentioned (3% of respondents). Although most of these respondents believed that their chance of benefit was greater and that their risk was lower than the population chance (optimists) (54.6%), a substantial minority of respondents (37.6%) were pessimists. CONCLUSIONS: TM continues to be prevalent. Estimates of personal benefit were not usually meant to report facts, it remains unknown whether respondents in the current study had TMis. Although they are not more vulnerable, phase 1 participants need improved understanding of key TM concepts, with attention to risks that are not present in standard of care. Cancer 2012. (c) 2012 American Cancer Society
引用
收藏
页码:4571 / 4578
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Ethics of phase 1 oncology studies - Reexamining the arguments and data [J].
Agrawal, M ;
Emanuel, EJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (08) :1075-1082
[2]   Patients' decision-making process regarding participation in phase I oncology research [J].
Agrawal, Manish ;
Grady, Christine ;
Fairclough, Diane L. ;
Meropol, Neal J. ;
Maynard, Kim ;
Emanuel, Ezekiel J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (27) :4479-4484
[3]   Re-evaluating the therapeutic misconception: Response to Miller and Joffe [J].
Appelbaum, Paul S. ;
Lidz, Charles W. .
KENNEDY INSTITUTE OF ETHICS JOURNAL, 2006, 16 (04) :367-373
[4]   THE THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION - INFORMED CONSENT IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH [J].
APPELBAUM, PS ;
ROTH, LH ;
LIDZ, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 1982, 5 (3-4) :319-329
[5]   FALSE HOPES AND BEST DATA - CONSENT TO RESEARCH AND THE THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION [J].
APPELBAUM, PS ;
ROTH, LH ;
LIDZ, CW ;
BENSON, P ;
WINSLADE, W .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1987, 17 (02) :20-24
[6]  
Cohen L, 2001, CANCER, V91, P1949, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010515)91:10<1949::AID-CNCR1218>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-A
[8]   PERCEPTIONS OF CANCER-PATIENTS AND THEIR PHYSICIANS INVOLVED IN PHASE-I TRIALS [J].
DAUGHERTY, C ;
RATAIN, MJ ;
GROCHOWSKI, E ;
STOCKING, C ;
KODISH, E ;
MICK, R ;
SIEGLER, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (05) :1062-1072
[9]  
Daugherty C K, 2000, IRB, V22, P6, DOI 10.2307/3564113
[10]   RESPONSES AND TOXIC DEATHS IN PHASE-I CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DECOSTER, G ;
STEIN, G ;
HOLDENER, EE .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1990, 1 (03) :175-181