GFDL's ESM2 Global Coupled Climate-Carbon Earth System Models. Part I: Physical Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics

被引:945
|
作者
Dunne, John P. [1 ]
John, Jasmin G. [1 ]
Adcroft, Alistair J. [2 ]
Griffies, Stephen M. [1 ]
Hallberg, Robert W. [1 ]
Shevliakova, Elena [3 ]
Stouffer, Ronald J. [1 ]
Cooke, William [4 ]
Dunne, Krista A. [1 ,5 ]
Harrison, Matthew J. [1 ]
Krasting, John P. [1 ,4 ]
Malyshev, Sergey L. [3 ]
Milly, P. C. D. [1 ,5 ]
Phillipps, Peter J. [1 ]
Sentman, Lori T. [1 ]
Samuels, Bonita L. [1 ]
Spelman, Michael J. [4 ]
Winton, Michael [1 ]
Wittenberg, Andrew T. [1 ]
Zadeh, Niki [4 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, NOAA, GFDL, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Program Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[3] Princeton Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[4] DRC, High Performance Technol Grp, Princeton, NJ USA
[5] US Geol Survey, Princeton, NJ USA
关键词
OCEAN CIRCULATION; INITIAL CONDITIONS; NUMERICAL-MODEL; SOUTHERN-OCEAN; Z-COORDINATE; EL-NINO; SEA-ICE; ATMOSPHERE; IMPACT; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00560.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The physical climate formulation and simulation characteristics of two new global coupled carbon-climate Earth System Models, ESM2M and ESM2G, are described. These models demonstrate similar climate fidelity as the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory's previous Climate Model version 2.1 (CM2.1) while incorporating explicit and consistent carbon dynamics. The two models differ exclusively in the physical ocean component; ESM2M uses Modular Ocean Model version 4p1 with vertical pressure layers while ESM2G uses Generalized Ocean Layer Dynamics with a bulk mixed layer and interior isopycnal layers. Differences in the ocean mean state include the thermocline depth being relatively deep in ESM2M and relatively shallow in ESM2G compared to observations. The crucial role of ocean dynamics on climate variability is highlighted in El Nino-Southern Oscillation being overly strong in ESM2M and overly weak in ESM2G relative to observations. Thus, while ESM2G might better represent climate changes relating to total heat content variability given its lack of long-term drift, gyre circulation, and ventilation in the North Pacific, tropical Atlantic, and Indian Oceans, and depth structure in the overturning and abyssal flows, ESM2M might better represent climate changes relating to surface circulation given its superior surface temperature, salinity, and height patterns, tropical Pacific circulation and variability, and Southern Ocean dynamics. The overall assessment is that neither model is fundamentally superior to the other, and that both models achieve sufficient fidelity to allow meaningful climate and earth system modeling applications. This affords the ability to assess the role of ocean configuration on earth system interactions in the context of two state-of-the-art coupled carbon-climate models.
引用
收藏
页码:6646 / 6665
页数:20
相关论文
共 1 条
  • [1] GFDL's ESM2 Global Coupled Climate-Carbon Earth System Models. Part II: Carbon System Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics
    Dunne, John P.
    John, Jasmin G.
    Shevliakova, Elena
    Stouffer, Ronald J.
    Krasting, John P.
    Malyshev, Sergey L.
    Milly, P. C. D.
    Sentman, Lori T.
    Adcroft, Alistair J.
    Cooke, William
    Dunne, Krista A.
    Griffies, Stephen M.
    Hallberg, Robert W.
    Harrison, Matthew J.
    Levy, Hiram
    Wittenberg, Andrew T.
    Phillips, Peter J.
    Zadeh, Niki
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (07) : 2247 - 2267