Development and validation of the Moral Character Questionnaire

被引:15
作者
Furr, R. Michael [1 ]
Prentice, Mike [1 ]
Parham, Ashley Hawkins [1 ]
Jayawickreme, Eranda [1 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Winston Salem, NC USA
关键词
Morality; Character; Personality assessment; Quantifying construct validity; Positive psychology; Personality; HEXACO; PERSONALITY; PERCEPTION; AGREEMENT; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104228
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although moral character may be the most central and consequential facet of one's personality, existing measures are few and suffer from shortcomings. We present the Moral Character Questionnaire (MCQ) to focus primarily on global moral character and secondarily on six moral domains - Honesty, Compassion, Fairness, Loyalty, Respect, and Purity. All subscales assess core components of personality dispositions, including behavior, motivation, cognition, and identity. Across 14 samples and >13,000 participants, MCQ subscales are generally unidimensional, have good-to-strong reliability, and are temporally stable. Based upon hypotheses regarding 21 criterion measures, analyses reveal strong convergent/discriminant validity. Finally, we found connections between the MCQ scales and core personality traits. The MCQ is an efficient and psychometrically strong measure grounded in contemporary personality theory.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Development, reliability, and validity of the Moral Identity Questionnaire
    Black, Jessica E.
    Reynolds, William M.
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2016, 97 : 120 - 129
  • [2] Development and Validation of an Expanded Version of the Three-Factor Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale
    Christian, Elliott
    Sellbom, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2016, 98 (02) : 155 - 168
  • [3] Agreement and similarity in self-other perceptions of moral character
    Cohen, Taya R.
    Panter, A. T.
    Turan, Nazli
    Morse, Lily
    Kim, Yeonjeong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2013, 47 (06) : 816 - 830
  • [4] Colquitt J.A., 2015, OXFORD HDB JUSTICE W, V1, P187, DOI [DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199981410.013.8, 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199981410.013.8]
  • [5] Condon D.M., 2018, The SAPA Personality Inventory: An empirically-derived, hierarchically-organized self-report personality assessment model, DOI [DOI 10.31234/OSF.IO/SC4P9, 10.31234/ osf.io/sc4p9]
  • [6] The 24-item Brief HEXACO Inventory (BHI)
    de Vries, Reinout E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2013, 47 (06) : 871 - 880
  • [7] Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five
    DeYoung, Colin G.
    Quilty, Lena C.
    Peterson, Jordan B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 93 (05) : 880 - 896
  • [8] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING
    DIENER, E
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1984, 95 (03) : 542 - 575
  • [9] Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust
    Evans, Anthony M.
    Revelle, William
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2008, 42 (06) : 1585 - 1593
  • [10] Frankly, We Do Give a Damn: The Relationship Between Profanity and Honesty
    Feldman, Gilad
    Lian, Huiwen
    Kosinski, Michal
    Stillwell, David
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2017, 8 (07) : 816 - 826