Wage inequality and poverty effects of lockdown and social distancing in Europe

被引:140
作者
Palomino, Juan C. [1 ,2 ]
Rodriguez, Juan G. [3 ,4 ]
Sebastian, Raquel [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, INET, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Social Policy & Intervent, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Complutense Madrid, EQUALITAS, ICAE, Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Complutense Madrid, CEDESOG, Madrid, Spain
[5] Univ Complutense Madrid, EQUALITAS, Madrid, Spain
[6] Univ Complutense Madrid, ICAE, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Wage inequality; Poverty; Teleworking; Social distancing; Europe;
D O I
10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103564
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Social distancing and lockdown measures taken to contain the spread of COVID-19 may have distributional economic costs beyond the contraction of GDP. Here we evaluate the capacity of individuals to work under a lockdown based on a Lockdown Working Ability index which considers their teleworking capacity and whether their occupation is essential or closed. Our analysis reveals substantial and uneven potential wage losses across the distribution all around Europe and we consistently find that both poverty and wage inequality rise in all European countries. Under four different scenarios (2 months of lockdown and 2 months of lockdown plus 6 months of partial functioning of closed occupations at 80%, 70% and 60% of full capacity) we estimate for 29 European countries an average increase in the headcount poverty index that goes from 4.9 to 9.4 percentage points and a mean loss rate for poor workers between 10% and 16.2%. The average increase in the Gini coefficient ranges between 3.5% to 7.3% depending on the scenario considered. Decomposing overall wage inequality in Europe, we find that lockdown and social distance measures produce a double process of divergence: both inequality within and between countries increase. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Advantage at Sea, P21
[2]  
BBVA Research, 2020, IMP COVID 19 CONS ES
[3]   Poverty accounting [J].
Bluhm, Richard ;
de Crombrugghe, Denis ;
Szirmai, Adam .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 104 :237-255
[4]   DECOMPOSABLE INCOME INEQUALITY MEASURES [J].
BOURGUIGNON, F .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (04) :901-920
[5]  
Brunori P., 2020, DISTANT UNEQUA UNPUB
[6]  
Chetty R., 2020, 27431 NBER
[7]   Supply and demand shocks in the COVID-19 pandemic: an industry and occupation perspective [J].
del Rio-Chanona, R. Maria ;
Mealy, Penny ;
Pichler, Anton ;
Lafond, Francois ;
Farmer, J. Doyne .
OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2020, 36 :S94-S137
[8]   How many jobs can be done at home? [J].
Dingel, Jonathan, I ;
Neiman, Brent .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2020, 189
[9]   TAX PROGRESSION AND INEQUALITY OF INCOME-DISTRIBUTION [J].
EICHHORN, W ;
FUNKE, H ;
RICHTER, WF .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 1984, 13 (02) :127-131
[10]   MEASURING PRO-POORNESS: A UNIFYING APPROACH WITH NEW RESULTS [J].
Essama-Nssah, B. ;
Lambert, Peter J. .
REVIEW OF INCOME AND WEALTH, 2009, 55 (03) :752-778