Scar assessment scales: a dermatologic overview

被引:74
作者
Idriss, Nayla [2 ]
Maibach, Howard I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Dermatol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Tulane Univ, Sch Med, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
关键词
scar; scar scales; scar metrics; human; FEASIBLE TOOL; RELIABILITY; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0846.2008.00327.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
This overview critically compares subjective assessment tools and available objective measurement tools with potential devices becoming available. Our goal is to lay out the benefits of each scar assessment scale in order to propose good management skills for scars along with strong metric skills. Classifying a scar is important in daily clinical practice. Ultimately choosing which treatment modality best fits can become a challenge. Scar classification needs a more detailed and systematic approach. We researched all different factors contributing to scar formation to come up with a more detailed criteria. Such factors included pigmentation/vascularity, surface texture, surface area, thickness (scar height), and pliability. Few studies have assessed scars; each provided an assessment scale of their own. Each scale is compared on the basis of accuracy, reliability, convenience in terms of feasibility and price. There remains still no ideal objective measurement out there despite promise seen in subjective evaluation. Method refinement will however accelerate our knowledge and interventions - based on increasing study power with enhanced metrics.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 5
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Baryza Mary Jo, 1995, Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, V16, P535, DOI 10.1097/00004630-199509000-00013
[2]   A new quantitative scale for clinical scar assessment [J].
Beausang, E ;
Floyd, H ;
Dunn, KW ;
Orton, CI ;
Ferguson, MWJ .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 102 (06) :1954-1961
[3]   Reliability of photographic analysis in determining change in scar appearance [J].
Crowe, JM ;
Simpson, K ;
Johnson, W ;
Allen, J .
JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & REHABILITATION, 1998, 19 (02) :183-186
[4]   The patient and observer scar assessment scale: A reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation [J].
Draaijers, LJ ;
Tempelman, FRH ;
Botman, YAM ;
Tuinebreijer, WE ;
Middelkoop, E ;
Kreis, RW ;
van Zuijlen, PPM .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (07) :1960-1965
[5]   Reliability testing of a new scar assessment tool, matching assessment of scars and photographs (MAPS) [J].
Masters, M ;
McMahon, M ;
Svens, B .
JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & REHABILITATION, 2005, 26 (03) :273-284
[6]  
Mustoe TA, 2004, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V113, P1966, DOI 10.1097/01.PRS.0000122208.16595.57
[7]   International clinical recommendations on scar management [J].
Mustoe, TA ;
Cooter, RD ;
Gold, MH ;
Hobbs, R ;
Ramelet, AA ;
Shakespeare, PG ;
Stella, M ;
Téot, L ;
Wood, FM ;
Ziegler, UE .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 110 (02) :560-571
[8]   Rating the resolving hypertrophic scar: Comparison of the Vancouver scar scale and scar volume [J].
Nedelec, B ;
Shankowsky, HA ;
Tredget, EE .
JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & REHABILITATION, 2000, 21 (03) :205-212
[9]   Scar assessment: Current problems and future solutions [J].
Powers, PS ;
Sarkar, S ;
Goldgof, DB ;
Cruse, CW ;
Tsap, LV .
JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & REHABILITATION, 1999, 20 (01) :54-60
[10]  
ROVEE DT, 2004, EPIDERMIS WOUND HEAL, P25