Working memory load disrupts gaze-cued orienting of attention

被引:24
作者
Bobak, Anna K. [1 ]
Langton, Stephen R. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stirling, Sch Nat Sci, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2015年 / 6卷
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
gaze-cued attention; working memory; top-down control; random number generation; executive load; FRONTAL-LOBE DAMAGE; SOCIAL ATTENTION; VISUAL-ATTENTION; EYE GAZE; COUNTERPREDICTIVE GAZE; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SPATIAL ATTENTION; ARROW CUES; REFLEXIVE; CAPTURE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01258
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A large body of work has shown that a perceived gaze shift produces a shift in a viewer's spatial attention in the direction of the seen gaze. A controversial issue surrounds the extent to which this gaze-cued orienting effect is stimulus-driven, or is under a degree of top-down control. In two experiments we show that the gaze-cued orienting effect is disrupted by a concurrent task that has been shown to place high demands on executive resources: random number generation (RNG). In Experiment 1 participants were faster to locate targets that appeared in gaze-cued locations relative to targets that appeared in locations opposite to those indicated by the gaze shifts, while simultaneously and continuously reciting aloud the digits 1-9 in order; however, this gaze-cueing effect was eliminated when participants continuously recited the same digits in a random order. RNG was also found to interfere with gaze-cued orienting in Experiment 2 where participants performed a speeded letter identification response. Together, these data suggest that gaze-cued orienting is actually under top-down control. We argue that top-down signals sustain a goal to shift attention in response to gazes, such that orienting ordinarily occurs when they are perceived; however, the goal cannot always be maintained when concurrent, multiple, competing goals are simultaneously active in working memory.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
[11]   Intelligence and the frontal lobe: The organization of goal-directed behavior [J].
Duncan, J ;
Emslie, H ;
Williams, P ;
Johnson, R ;
Freer, C .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 30 (03) :257-303
[12]  
Findlay J M., 2003, Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing, P35, DOI [DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198524793.003.0003, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524793.003.0003]
[13]   Do new objects capture attention? [J].
Franconeri, SL ;
Hollingworth, A ;
Simons, DJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (04) :275-281
[14]   What Affects Social Attention? Social Presence, Eye Contact and Autistic Traits [J].
Freeth, Megan ;
Foulsham, Tom ;
Kingstone, Alan .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (01)
[15]   Does gaze direction really trigger a reflexive shift of spatial attention? [J].
Friesen, CK ;
Moore, C ;
Kingstone, A .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2005, 57 (01) :66-69
[16]   Attentional effects of counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues [J].
Friesen, CK ;
Ristic, J ;
Kingstone, A .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2004, 30 (02) :319-329
[17]   The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze [J].
Friesen, CK ;
Kingstone, A .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1998, 5 (03) :490-495
[18]   Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences [J].
Frischen, Alexandra ;
Bayliss, Andrew P. ;
Tipper, Steven P. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2007, 133 (04) :694-724
[19]   Eye gaze cannot be ignored (but neither can arrows) [J].
Galfano, Giovanni ;
Dalmaso, Mario ;
Marzoli, Daniele ;
Pavan, Giulia ;
Coricelli, Carol ;
Castelli, Luigi .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 65 (10) :1895-1910
[20]   WORKING MEMORY AND STRATEGIES IN SYLLOGISTIC-REASONING TASKS [J].
GILHOOLY, KJ ;
LOGIE, RH ;
WETHERICK, NE ;
WYNN, V .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1993, 21 (01) :115-124