The Predictive Value of Endorectal 3 Tesla Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Extraprostatic Extension in Patients with Low, Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer

被引:157
作者
Somford, D. M. [1 ,3 ]
Hamoen, E. H. [3 ,4 ]
Futterer, J. J. [4 ]
van Basten, J. P. [1 ]
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, C. A. [5 ]
Vreuls, W. [2 ]
van Oort, I. M. [3 ]
Vergunst, H. [1 ]
Kiemeney, L. A. [3 ]
Barentsz, J. O. [4 ]
Witjes, J. A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Urol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Pathol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; neoplasm staging; magnetic resonance imaging; predictive value of tests; risk; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; NEUROVASCULAR BUNDLES; INCREMENTAL VALUE; GLEASON SCORE; MRI; LOCALIZATION; DECISION; BIOPSY; COIL; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.021
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We determined the positive and negative predictive values of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension at radical prostatectomy for different prostate cancer risk groups. Materials and Methods: We evaluated a cohort of 183 patients who underwent 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, including T2-weighted, diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced sequences, with an endorectal coil before radical prostatectomy. Pathological stage at radical prostatectomy was used as standard reference for extraprostatic extension. The cohort was classified into low, intermediate and high risk groups according to the D'Amico criteria. We recorded prevalence of extraprostatic extension at radical prostatectomy and determined sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in each group. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of extraprostatic extension at radical prostatectomy. Results: The overall prevalence of extraprostatic extension at radical prostatectomy was 49.7% ranging from 24.7% to 77.1% between low and high risk categories. Overall staging accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension was 73.8%, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 58.2%, 89.1%, 84.1% and 68.3%, respectively. Positive predictive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension was best in the high risk cohort with 88.8%. Negative predictive value was highest in the low risk cohort with 87.7%. With an odds ratio of 10.3 multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging is by far the best preoperative predictor of extraprostatic extension at radical prostatectomy. Conclusions: For adequate patient counseling, knowledge of predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension is of utmost importance. High negative predictive value, important for decisions on nerve sparing strategies at radical prostatectomy, is only reached in low risk subjects.
引用
收藏
页码:1728 / 1734
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[2]   MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T:: Comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging [J].
Beyersdorff, D ;
Taymoorian, K ;
Knösel, T ;
Schnorr, D ;
Felix, R ;
Hamm, B ;
Bruhn, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 185 (05) :1214-1220
[3]  
Bostwick DG, 1997, EUR UROL, V32, P2
[4]   Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: Alternative parameterizations and model selection [J].
Chu, Haitao ;
Nie, Lei ;
Cole, Stephen R. ;
Poole, Charles .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (18) :2384-2399
[5]   Endorectal 3D T2-weighted 1 mm-slice thickness MRI for prostate cancer staging at 1.5 Tesla: Should we reconsider the indirects signs of extracapsular extension according to the D'Amico tumor risk criteria? [J].
Cornud, F. ;
Rouanne, M. ;
Beuvon, F. ;
Eiss, D. ;
Flam, T. ;
Liberatore, M. ;
Zerbib, M. ;
Delongchamps, N. B. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (04) :E591-E597
[6]   Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Blank, K ;
Broderick, GA ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Kaplan, I ;
Beard, CJ ;
Wein, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :969-974
[7]   Prostate cancer:: Local staging at 3-T endorectal MR imaging -: Early experience [J].
Fütterer, JJ ;
Heijmink, SWTPJ ;
Scheenen, TWJ ;
Jager, GJ ;
Van de Kaa, CAH ;
Witjes, JA ;
Barentsz, JO .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 238 (01) :184-191
[8]   Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils - Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging [J].
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Engelbrecht, Marc R. ;
Jager, Gerrit J. ;
Hartman, Robert P. ;
King, Bernard F. ;
Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (04) :1055-1065
[9]  
Gontero P, 2008, Eur Urol, V54, P957, DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.110
[10]   Under staging and under grading in a contemporary series of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: Results from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor database [J].
Grossfeld, GD ;
Chang, JJ ;
Broering, JM ;
Li, JP ;
Lubeck, DP ;
Flanders, SC ;
Carroll, PR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (03) :851-856