Conundrums of competitive ability in plants: what to measure?

被引:101
作者
Aarssen, LW [1 ]
Keogh, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Biol, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.960314.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
A survey of recent literature indicates that competitive ability in plants has been measured, in most studies, only in terms of the relative intensity of size suppression experienced by competitors within one growing season. Far fewer studies have recorded relative success in terms of survival and even fewer studies have recorded fecundity under competition. Differences in size suppression are usually assumed to reflect differences in relative abilities to deny resources to competitors. However, most previous studies have failed to control or account for other sources of variation in the size suppression that plants experience under competition, i.e. variation between mixtures in the resource supply/demand ratio (approach to carrying capacity), or variation in the degree of niche overlap between competitors, or variation in the intensity of concurrent facilitative interactions between competitors. For future studies, much greater caution is required in recognizing these inherent limitations of traditional measures of competitive ability and, hence, guarding against unfounded conclusions or predictions about potential for competitive success that are based on these measures. There is also a significant challenge for future studies to adopt empirical approaches for minimizing these limitations. Some initial recommendations are considered here based on an emerging view of competitive ability measured in terms of traits associated with all three conventional components of Darwinian fitness, i.e. not just growth (plant size) but also survival and fecundity allocation (offspring production per unit plant size per unit time). According to this model, differences in competitive ability imply differences in the ability, despite intense competition (i.e. low resource supply/demand ratio), to recruit offspring into the next generation and thereby limit offspring recruitment by other plants. The important traits of competitive ability, therefore, are not only those that allow a plant to deny resources to competitors suppress their sizes and hence. maximize the plant's own size: but also those traits that allow the plant to withstand suppression from competition enough to persist, both as an individual (through survival) and across generations (through descendants).
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 542
页数:12
相关论文
共 88 条
[11]   Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: mechanisms, trade-offs and plant-soil feedbacks [J].
Aerts, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1999, 50 (330) :29-37
[12]   THE COSTS OF REPRODUCTION AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES [J].
BELL, G .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1980, 116 (01) :45-76
[13]   COMPETITION AND COEXISTENCE IN PLANT-COMMUNITIES [J].
BENGTSSON, J ;
FAGERSTROM, T ;
RYDIN, H .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1994, 9 (07) :246-250
[14]  
Berendse F, 1987, FUNCT ECOL, V1, P293
[15]   COMPETITION BETWEEN PLANT-POPULATIONS AT LOW AND HIGH NUTRIENT SUPPLIES [J].
BERENDSE, F .
OIKOS, 1994, 71 (02) :253-260
[16]   Spatial moment equations for plant competition: Understanding spatial strategies and the advantages of short dispersal [J].
Bolker, BM ;
Pacala, SW .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1999, 153 (06) :575-602
[17]   The balance between positive and negative plant interactions and its relationship to environmental gradients: a model [J].
Brooker, RW ;
Callaghan, TV .
OIKOS, 1998, 81 (01) :196-207
[18]  
Burns RM, 1990, AGR HDB USDA FOREST, V654
[19]   Species interactions at the level of fine roots in the field: Influence of soil nutrient heterogeneity and plant size [J].
Caldwell, MM ;
Manwaring, JH ;
Durham, SL .
OECOLOGIA, 1996, 106 (04) :440-447
[20]  
CALDWELL MM, 1988, P 14 INT BOT C BERL, P14