Student-teacher relationship and classroom goal structure profiles: Promoting achievement and preventing externalizing and internalizing behaviors

被引:7
作者
Gallo, Angela [1 ]
Olivier, Elizabeth [2 ]
Archambault, Isabelle [3 ]
Morin, Alexandre J. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Psychol, Substant Methodol Synergy Res Lab, 7141 Sherbrooke, Montreal, PQ H4B 1R6, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Dept Psychopedag & Andrag, 90 Ave Vincent dIndy, Montreal, PQ H2V 2S9, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Ecole Psychoeduc, Canada Res Chair Sch Youth Well Being & Educ Succ, 90 Ave Vincent dIndy, Montreal, PQ H2V 2S9, Canada
基金
加拿大魁北克医学研究基金会;
关键词
Student-teacher relationships; Mastery and performance goal structures; Achievement; Externalizing behaviors; Internalizing behaviors; INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; DEVELOPMENTAL CASCADES; ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT; READING-SKILLS; MEDIATING ROLE; PERCEPTIONS; SCHOOL; MOTIVATION; CHILDHOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101684
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigates which profiles, defined based on students reports of student-teacher relationships (closeness; conflict) and classroom goal structures (mastery; performance), were optimal to support adjustment (externalizing and internalizing behaviors) and achievement in Math and Language. Elementary students (Grades 3-6, N = 703) and their teachers (N = 33) completed questionnaires in November 2011 and April 2012. Latent profile analysis identified four profiles, replicated across boys and girls: Average (44.46%), Mastery-Closeness (39.13%), Conflict (6.49%), and Approach-Closeness (9.92%). Students from the Conflict profile displayed more externalizing and internalizing behaviors than other students, whereas those from the Mastery-Closeness and Approach-Closeness profiles displayed the least difficulties. Students from the Approach-Closeness profile displayed the lowest achievement at the beginning of the year but the steepest increase over time.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] CLASSIFICATION OF CHILD PSYCHOPATHOLOGY - REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF EMPIRICAL EFFORTS
    ACHENBACH, TM
    EDELBROCK, CS
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1978, 85 (06) : 1275 - 1301
  • [2] AN ETHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO PERSONALITY-DEVELOPMENT
    AINSWORTH, MDS
    BOWLBY, J
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1991, 46 (04) : 333 - 341
  • [3] Anderman L.H., 1999, Journal of Research and Development in Education, V32, P89, DOI DOI 10.1006/CEPS.1998.0978
  • [4] Transactional associations between classroom engagement and relations with teachers from first through fourth grade
    Archambault, I.
    Pagani, L. S.
    Fitzpatrick, C.
    [J]. LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2013, 23 : 1 - 9
  • [5] Sampling weights in latent variable modeling
    Asparouhov, T
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2005, 12 (03) : 411 - 434
  • [6] Profiles of middle school science teachers: Accounting for cognitive and motivational characteristics
    Bae, Christine L.
    Hayes, Kathryn N.
    DeBusk-Lane, Morgan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2020, 57 (06) : 911 - 942
  • [7] The teacher-student relationship as a developmental context for children with internalizing or externalizing behavior problems
    Baker, Jean A.
    Grant, Sycarah
    Morlock, Larissa
    [J]. SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2008, 23 (01) : 3 - 15
  • [8] A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students
    Baker, S
    Gersten, R
    Lee, DS
    [J]. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JOURNAL, 2002, 103 (01) : 51 - 73
  • [9] Within-class consensus on classroom goal structures - Relations to achievement and achievement goals in mathematics and language classes
    Bardach, Lisa
    Yanagida, Takuya
    Schober, Barbara
    Lueftenegger, Marko
    [J]. LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2018, 67 : 78 - 90
  • [10] Bierman K.L., 2014, Handbook of developmental psychopathology, V3rd, P467, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4614-9608-3_24, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-9608-324, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9608-324]