Attitudes and views of the general public towards research participation

被引:20
作者
Burns, K. E. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Magyarody, N. [4 ]
Jiang, D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wald, R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Interdept Div Crit Care Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] St Michaels Hosp, Keenan Res Ctr, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[3] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, London, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
general public; research participation; research ethics; consent; survey method; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS; CARE RESEARCH; ONCOLOGY; CONSENT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02433.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background While the challenges of recruitment into clinical trials are well described, little is known about the public's perceptions towards research. Aims We sought to describe the attitudes, beliefs and knowledge of the public towards research and research participation, focusing on clinical trials, contrast these attributes among individuals with different relationships with the healthcare system and to identify predictors of willingness to participate. Methods We conducted a self-administered cross-sectional survey of patients and their significant others in two clinics and two intensive care unit waiting rooms and in three public venues. Results We analysed responses from 417 respondents (102 and 105 in dialysis and oncology clinics, and 106 in intensive care unit (ICU) waiting rooms, 104 in public locations). While most (68.3%) respondents favoured the use of humans in clinical trials, 53% felt that trial participants always or almost always receive the best quality of care, only 30.4% had participated in clinical research. Approximately 70% felt that subjects are always advised of the risks and benefits of participation, and 30% expressed ambiguity regarding whether participants are informed of their involvement. Oncology and dialysis respondents were the most and least informed regarding research methods and ethics. The perceived risks and benefits associated with clinical circumstances influence research participation decisions and vary with healthcare experiences. We identified six predictors of willingness to participate. Conclusion Attitudes of the public towards research participation are beleaguered by misconceptions. Stakeholders in clinical research must educate the general public regarding research methods and ethics.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 540
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Apolone Giovanni, 2003, J Ambul Care Manage, V26, P83
  • [2] Focus group interviews examining attitudes towards medical research among the Japanese: A qualitative study
    Asai, A
    Ohnishi, M
    Nishigaki, E
    Sekimoto, M
    Fukuhara, S
    Fukui, T
    [J]. BIOETHICS, 2004, 18 (05) : 448 - 470
  • [3] ATTITUDES TOWARD CLINICAL-TRIALS AMONG PATIENTS AND THE PUBLIC
    CASSILETH, BR
    LUSK, EJ
    MILLER, DS
    HURWITZ, S
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1982, 248 (08): : 968 - 970
  • [4] Ability of family members to predict patient's consent to critical care research
    Ciroldi, Magali
    Cariou, Alain
    Adrie, Christophe
    Annane, Djilali
    Castelain, Vincent
    Cohen, Yves
    Delahaye, Arnaud
    Joly, Luc Marie
    Galliot, Richard
    Garrouste-Orgeas, Maite
    Papazian, Laurent
    Michel, Fabrice
    Barnes, Nancy Kenstish
    Schlemmer, Benoit
    Pochard, Frederic
    Azoulay, Elie
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 33 (05) : 807 - 813
  • [5] Do surrogate decision makers provide accurate consent for intensive care research?
    Coppolino, M
    Ackerson, L
    [J]. CHEST, 2001, 119 (02) : 603 - 612
  • [6] Attitudes towards and participation in randomised clinical trials in oncology: A review of the literature
    Ellis, PM
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2000, 11 (08) : 939 - 945
  • [7] GANZ PA, 1990, CANCER, V65, P2394, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19900515)65:10+<2394::AID-CNCR2820651509>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-#
  • [9] REGRESSION MODELING STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVED PROGNOSTIC PREDICTION
    HARRELL, FE
    LEE, KL
    CALIFF, RM
    PRYOR, DB
    ROSATI, RA
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1984, 3 (02) : 143 - 152
  • [10] KEMP N, 1984, CLIN ONCOL, V10, P155