ANALYSIS OF MODERN DIGITAL IMPRESSION TECHNOLOGIES REVIEW

被引：0

作者：

Cojocariu, Andreea-Codruta ^{[1
]}

Neagu, Carina Sonia ^{[1
]}

Serban, Christa ^{[1
]}

Modiga, Cristina ^{[1
]}

Togoe, Marius Mihai ^{[1
]}

Jivanescu, Anca ^{[1
]}

Negrutiu, Meda-Lavinia ^{[1
]}

Duma, Virgil-Florin ^{[2
]}

Podoleanu, Adrian Gh. ^{[3
]}

Sinescu, Cosmin ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Victor Babes Univ Med & Pharm Timisoara, 2 Piata Eftimie Murgu, Timisoara 300041, Romania

[2] Aurel Vlaicu Univ Arad, 3OM Optomechatron Grp, 77 Revolutiei Ave, Arad 310130, Romania

[3] Univ Kent, Sch Phys Sci, Appl Opt Grp, Canterbury CT2 7NH, Kent, England

来源：

ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION | 2019年 / 11卷 / 01期

关键词：

intraoral optic scanning; ultrasound impression; OCT impression; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ACCURACY; SYSTEM; SCANS;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R78 [口腔科学];

学科分类号：

1003 ;

摘要：

Aim of the study The purpose of this study is to review the latest technologies and to present their operating principles in order to enable practitioners to have a clearer picture of the preferred technology for use in day-today practice. Material and methods For this review, the literature was analysed online. The sites that were searched were PubMed, Web of Science. The keywords used to search for items of interest were: intraoral optic scanning, ultrasound impression, OCT impression. Results The multitude of available impression techniques have many advantages allowing practitioners the opportunity to chose their prefered method. In recent years, various revolutionary impression methods and technologies have appeared on the market. Conclusions The digital impression techniques, regardless of the technology used, have a lot of qualities, being non-invasive, easy to work with for the practitioner, and easy to accept for the patient.

引用

页码：25 / 31

页数：7

共 24 条

[11] Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial
Joda, Tim
Bragger, Urs
[J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (12) : E185 - E189
[12] ULTRASOUND IN DENTISTRY .1. BIOPHYSICAL INTERACTIONS
LAIRD, WRE
WALMSLEY, AD
[J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1991, 19 (01) : 14 - 17
[13] Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes
Lee, Sang J.
Gallucci, German O.
[J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (01) : 111 - 115
[14] The Use of Optical Coherence Tomography in Dental Diagnostics: A State-of-the-Art Review
Machoy, Monika
Seeliger, Julia
Szyszka-Sommerfeld, Liliana
Koprowski, Robert
Gedrange, Tomasz
Wozniak, Krzysztof
[J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING, 2017, 2017
[15] High-Resolution 3D Ultrasound Jawbone Surface Imaging for Diagnosis of Periodontal Bony Defects: An In Vitro Study
Mahmoud, Ahmed M.
Ngan, Peter
Crout, Richard
Mukdadi, Osama M.
[J]. ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 38 (11) : 3409 - 3422
[16] An update on the use of ultrasound imaging in oral and maxillofacial surgery
Oeppen, Rachel S.
Gibson, Daren
Brennan, Peter A.
[J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 48 (06) : 412 - 418
[17] Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners
Patzelt, Sebastian B. M.
Emmanouilidi, Archontia
Stampf, Susanne
Strub, Joerg R.
Att, Wael
[J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 18 (06) : 1687 - 1694
[18] Effect of ultrasound on herpes simplex virus infection in cell culture
Shintani, Motoko
Takahashi, Gen
Hamada, Masakazu
Okunaga, Shyusuke
Iwai, Soichi
Yura, Yoshiaki
[J]. VIROLOGY JOURNAL, 2011, 8
[19] 3-D finite element simulation for ultrasonic propagation in tooth
Sun, Xiaoqing
Witzel, Erich A.
Bian, Hongxin
Kang, Shaoying
[J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2008, 36 (07) : 546 - 553
[20] Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling
Syrek, Andreas
Reich, Gunnar
Ranftl, Dieter
Klein, Christoph
Cerny, Barbara
Brodesser, Jutta
[J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2010, 38 (07) : 553 - 559

← 1 2 3 →