Comparison of ELISA and PCR vis-a-vis cultural methods for detecting Aeromonas spp. in foods of animal origin

被引:25
|
作者
Arora, S
Agarwal, RK
Bist, B
机构
[1] Indian Vet Res Inst, Div Vet Publ Hlth, Izatnagar 243122, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Coll Vet Sci & Anim Husb, Dept Vet Publ Hlth, Mathura 281001, UP, India
关键词
Aeromonas; PCR; ELISA; chicken; milk;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.06.019
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The present study was conducted to assess the best method of the most commonly used methods for detection of aeromonads in foods of animal origin. With this objective an OMP based indirect plate ELISA and a duplex-PCR using primers targeting aerolysin gene and 16S rRNA gene and yielding amplicons of 252 bp and 599 bp, respectively, were standardized. The standardized protocols and the conventional cultural method were then compared for their respective sensitivities and specificities for detecting acromonads from chicken and milk samples. Both the standardized assays were found to be highly specific for Aeromonas. The efficiency of the standardized indirect-ELISA and duplex-PCR protocols was assessed by artificial inoculation studies with varying concentrations of Aeromonas cells inoculated in chicken and milk samples followed by enrichment in Alkaline Peptone Water supplemented with 10 mg/ml cephalothin (APW-C) for 12 h. The results revealed that indirect-ELISA was able to detect a minimum of 10(3) cells/ml or g of Aeromonas cells in spiked milk and chicken samples, respectively. Whereas, duplex-PCR and cultural method were able to detect as low as 1 cell/ml or g of Aeromonas cells in spiked milk and chicken samples. The developed assays were also tested for their efficiency to detect Aeromonas spp. in naturally contaminated milk and chicken samples. Out of a total 50 milk samples screened for presence of Aeromonas by the three methods viz., indirect-ELISA, duplex-PCR and cultural method only 1 (2%) turned out to be positive showing positive results by all three methods. Similarly, 50 samples of chicken were tested by all three methods. Three samples (6%) turned out to be positive and here again by all the three methods. (C) 2005 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 183
页数:7
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Comparison of PCR-ELISA and LightCycler real-time PCR assays for detecting Salmonella spp. in milk and meat samples
    Perelle, S
    Dilasser, F
    Malorny, B
    Grout, J
    Hoorfar, J
    Fach, P
    MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES, 2004, 18 (06) : 409 - 420
  • [2] Detection of Escherichia coli O157: H7 prevalence in foods of animal origin by cultural methods and PCR technique
    Kiranmayi, Ch. Bindu
    Krishnaiah, N.
    VETERINARY WORLD, 2010, 3 (01) : 13 - 16
  • [3] Comparison of DNA isolation methods and detection of Salmonella spp. from animal faeces and dust using invA real-time PCR
    Braun, Sascha D.
    Methner, Ulrich
    BERLINER UND MUNCHENER TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2011, 124 (5-6): : 177 - 185
  • [4] Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and molecular characterization by PCR and pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of Salmonella spp. isolated from foods of animal origin in San Luis, Argentina
    Isabel Favier, Gabriela
    Lucero Estrada, Cecilia S. M.
    Lazarte Otero, Valeria
    Esther Escudero, Maria
    FOOD CONTROL, 2013, 29 (01) : 49 - 54