Search behavior of individuals working in teams: A behavioral study on complex landscapes

被引:15
作者
Giannoccaro, Ilaria [1 ]
Galesic, Mirta [2 ,3 ]
Massari, Giovanni Francesco [1 ]
Barkoczi, Daniel [4 ]
Carbone, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Bari, Dept Mech Math & Management, Bari, Italy
[2] Santa Fe Inst, Santa Fe, NM 87501 USA
[3] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Berlin, Germany
[4] Linkoping Univ, Inst Analyt Sociol, Linkoping, Sweden
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Teams; Behavioral interdependence; Limited knowledge; Search; NK fitness landscape; Exploration vs. exploitation; EXPLORATION; PERFORMANCE; ORGANIZATIONS; INTERDEPENDENCE; CONSEQUENCES; ACCUMULATION; EXPLOITATION; ANTECEDENTS; INFORMATION; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.045
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Search is a fundamental part of complex problem solving and often involves a choice between the exploration of new ideas and the exploitation of already known solutions. While literature has mainly analyzed search behavior of individuals working alone, we investigate search accomplished by individuals working in teams. We study the interplay of three theoretically grounded factors that can affect the search behavior of individuals in teams: the level of behavioral interdependence among team members, the members' limited level of knowledge about the problem, and the performance feedback they receive. We operationalize search behavior in terms of search distance, which reflects the extent of exploration in problem space. Results show that high behavioral interdependence reduces exploration, while limited knowledge promotes exploration. Furthermore, positive performance feedback leads to reduced exploration, the more so the lower behavioral interdependence and the more limited knowledge are. We discuss theoretical and practical implications of these results for team design.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 516
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
[41]   An Experimental Study of Team Size and Performance on a Complex Task [J].
Mao, Andrew ;
Mason, Winter ;
Suri, Siddharth ;
Watts, Duncan J. .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (04)
[42]  
March J. G., 1991, HUM-COMPUT INTERACT, V6, P95, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327051HCI0602_1
[43]   Collaborative learning in networks [J].
Mason, Winter ;
Watts, Duncan J. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (03) :764-769
[44]  
Mehlhorn K., 2015, Decision, V2, P191, DOI [DOI 10.1037/DEC0000030, 10.1037/dec0000033, DOI 10.1037/DEC0000033]
[45]   Group-to-individual transfer of learning - Cognitive and social factors [J].
Olivera, F ;
Straus, SG .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2004, 35 (04) :440-465
[46]   Information foraging [J].
Pirolli, P ;
Card, S .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1999, 106 (04) :643-675
[47]   Modelling Bounded Rationality in Organizations: Progress and Prospects [J].
Puranam, Phanish ;
Stieglitz, Nils ;
Osman, Magda ;
Pillutla, Madan M. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2015, 9 (01) :337-392
[48]   Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design [J].
Rivkin, JW ;
Siggelkow, N .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (03) :290-311
[49]   Reproducing knowledge: Replication without imitation at moderate complexity [J].
Rivkin, JW .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2001, 12 (03) :274-293
[50]   COMPLEX INTERDEPENDENCE IN TASK-PERFORMING GROUPS [J].
SAAVEDRA, R ;
EARLEY, PC ;
VANDYNE, L .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (01) :61-72