Individualized nutrition intervention is of major benefit to colorectal cancer patients: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of nutritional therapy

被引:188
作者
Ravasco, Paula [1 ]
Monteiro-Grillo, Isabel [1 ,2 ]
Camila, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Fac Med, Inst Mol Med, Unidade Nutr & Metab, P-1699 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Hosp Univ Santa Maria, Serv Radioterapia, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CALORIC REQUIREMENTS; RADIATION-THERAPY; WEIGHT-LOSS; OUTCOMES; CHEMOTHERAPY; REAPPRAISAL; DEFINITION; CACHEXIA; DISEASE;
D O I
10.3945/ajcn.111.018838
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: In our published randomized trial in colorectal cancer, group 1 (n = 37) received individualized nutritional counseling and education about regular foods, group 2 (n = 37) received dietary supplements and consumed their usual diet of regular foods, and group 3 (n = 37) consumed their usual diet of regular foods. Neither group 2 nor group 3 received individualized counseling. Early nutritional counseling during radiotherapy was highly effective at reducing acute radiotherapy toxicity and improving nutritional intake/status and quality of life (QoL). Efficacy persisted for 3 mo after the intervention. Objective: The objective was to perform long-term follow-up in survivors of that clinical trial to specifically evaluate survival, late toxicity, QoL, and nutritional variables. Design: Medical data were collected from patients' records, and pre-scheduled interviews were conducted by dietitians for individualized evaluations. Analyses and comparisons between groups (adjusted for stage) were performed after a median follow-up of 6.5 (range: 4.9-8.1) y. Results: Patients complied with the Radiotherapy Department's follow-up protocol. Nutritional deterioration was higher (P < 0.001) in group 3 (n = 26) and group 2 (n = 29) than in group 1 (n = 34). Adequate nutritional status was maintained in 91% of group 1 patients but not in any of the group 3 patients (P < 0.002). Intakes in group 1 were similar to reference values, and the patients adhered to the prescribed recommendations. Intakes in groups 2 and 3 were lower than recommended intakes: group 3 similar or equal to group 2 < group 1 (P = 0.001). Median survival in group 3 was 4.9 y (30% died), in group 2 was 6.5 y (22% died), and in group 1 was 7.3 y (only 8% died): group 3 > group 2 > group 1 (P < 0.01). Late radiotherapy toxicity was higher in group 3 (n = 17; 65%) and group 2 = 17; 59%) than in group 1 (n = 3; 9%): group 3 = group 2 > group 1 (P < 0.001). QoL was worse in groups 3 and 2 than in group 1: group 3 similar or equal to group 2 < group 1 (P < 0.002). Worse radiotherapy toxicity, QoL, and mortality were associated with deteriorated nutritional status and intake (P < 0.001). Likewise, depleted intake, nutritional status, and QoL predicted shorter survival and late toxicity (HR: 8.25; 95% CI: 2.74, 1.47; P < 0.001). Conclusions: This study conveys novel information about the effectiveness of nutrition at improving long-term prognosis in colorectal cancer. Overall, the data indicate that early individualized nutritional counseling and education during radiotherapy is valuable for patients. Ant J Clin Nutr 2012;96:1346-53.
引用
收藏
页码:1346 / 1353
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]   Gastrointestinal problems after pelvic radiotherapy: the past, the present and the future [J].
Andreyev, H. J. N. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 19 (10) :790-799
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1985, EN PROT REQ
[4]  
Anthony Fauci.S., 2008, HARRISONS PRINCIPLES
[5]   ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition:: Non-surgical oncology [J].
Arends, J. ;
Bodoky, G. ;
Bozzetti, F. ;
Fearon, K. ;
Muscaritoli, M. ;
Selga, G. ;
van Bokhorst-de van der Schuereng, M. A. E. ;
von Meyenfeldt, M. ;
Zuercher, G. ;
Fietkau, R. ;
Aulbert, E. ;
Frick, B. ;
Holm, M. ;
Kneba, M. ;
Mestrom, H. J. ;
Zander, A. .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2006, 25 (02) :245-259
[6]   Nutrition intervention improves outcomes in patients with cancer cachexia receiving chemotherapy - a pilot study [J].
Bauer, JD ;
Capra, S .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2005, 13 (04) :270-274
[7]   Preventing or reducing late side effects of radiation therapy: radiobiology meets molecular pathology [J].
Bentzen, Soren M. .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2006, 6 (09) :702-713
[8]  
Beyer P, 2000, KRAUSES FOOD NUTR DI, V667-94, P667
[9]  
Burke Bertha S., 1947, JOUR AMER DIETETIC ASSOC, V23, P1041
[10]  
Capra S, 1998, NUTR DIET, V55, P54