Open Versus Endovascular Stent Graft Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

被引:90
作者
Dangas, George [1 ]
O'Connor, David [2 ]
Firwana, Belal
Brar, Somjot [4 ]
Ellozy, Sharif [2 ]
Vouyouka, Angeliki [2 ]
Arnold, Margaret [2 ]
Kosmas, Constantine E.
Krishnan, Prakash
Wiley, Jose
Suleman, Javed
Olin, Jeffrey [3 ]
Marin, Michael [2 ]
Faries, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Cardiovasc Inst, Div Cardiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Div Vasc Surg, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Cardiovasc Inst, Div Vasc Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente Med Ctr, Div Cardiol & Vasc Med, Los Angeles, CA 90034 USA
关键词
abdominal aortic aneurysmaortic aneurysm; endovascular procedure; general surgery; vascular disease; vascular surgical procedures; OUTCOMES; MORTALITY; PUBLICATION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; MORBIDITY; DISEASE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This study sought to evaluate the short-, intermediate-, and longer-term outcomes after endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), including both AAA-related and all-cause mortality. Background Endovascular stent graft placement for AAA has gained broad acceptance as an alternative to open surgical repair due to a lower perioperative morbidity and mortality. The intermediate- and long-term all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality vary among studies. Thus, we sought to perform a meta-analysis of open versus endovascular repair for treating AAA. Methods Electronic databases were queried for identification of prospective, randomized trials of open surgery versus endovascular stent graft repair of AAA. A total of 10 published papers reporting on 6 studies at different follow-up intervals were identified; they involved 2,899 patients with AAA repair procedures, of whom, 1,470 underwent endovascular stent graft AAA exclusion and 1,429 were treated by open AAA repair. Results At 30 days, the pooled relative risk of all-cause mortality was lower in the endovascular group (relative risk [RR]: 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19 to 0.64) than in the open surgery group. At intermediate follow-up, the all-cause mortality had a nonsignificant difference (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.57 to 1.08), the AAA-related mortality was significantly lower (RR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.74) and reintervention rates were higher (RR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.08) in the endovascular group than in the open surgery group. At long-term follow-up, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.15) or AAA-related mortality (RR: 1.58, 95% CI: 0.20 to 12.74), whereas the significant difference in the rate of reinterventions persisted (RR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.58 to 4.08). Conclusions In patients randomized to open or endovascular AAA repair, all-cause perioperative mortality, as well as AAA-related mortality at short- and intermediate- term follow-up are lower in patients undergoing endovascular stent graft placement. This was associated with greater reintervention in the endovascular group noted at intermediate follow-up. Long-term survival appears to converge between the 2 groups. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2012;5:1071-80) (c) 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:1071 / 1080
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MULTIMED MAN CARDIOT
[2]   A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patients [J].
Becquemin, Jean-Pierre ;
Pillet, Jean-Chistophe ;
Lescalie, Francois ;
Sapoval, Marc ;
Goueffic, Yann ;
Lermusiaux, Patrick ;
Steinmetz, Eric ;
Marzelle, Jean .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 53 (05) :1167-1173
[3]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[4]  
Blankensteijn JD, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P1624
[5]   Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Blankensteijn, JD ;
de Jong, SECA ;
Prinssen, M ;
van der Ham, AC ;
Buth, J ;
van Sterkenburg, SMM ;
Verhagen, HJM ;
Buskens, E ;
Grobbee, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (23) :2398-2405
[6]  
Bradbury AW, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P645
[7]   Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms - Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery [J].
Brewster, DC ;
Cronenwett, JL ;
Hallett, JW ;
Johnston, KW ;
Krupski, WC ;
Matsumura, JS .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 37 (05) :1106-1117
[8]   Long-Term Outcome of Open or Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm [J].
De Bruin, Jorg L. ;
Baas, Annette F. ;
Buth, Jaap ;
Prinssen, Monique ;
Verhoeven, Eric L. G. ;
Cuypers, Philippe W. M. ;
van Sambeek, Marc R. H. M. ;
Balm, Ron ;
Grobbee, Diederick E. ;
Blankensteijn, Jan D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (20) :1881-1889
[9]   Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update [J].
DerSimonian, Rebecca ;
Kacker, Raghu .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 28 (02) :105-114
[10]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634