How do internal capabilities and external partnerships affect innovativeness?

被引:161
作者
Su, Yu-Shan [1 ]
Tsang, Eric W. K. [2 ]
Peng, Mike W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Chang Jung Christian Univ, Dept Int Business, Tainan 711, Taiwan
[2] Univ Texas Dallas, Sch Management, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Product innovation; Process innovation; Internal capability; External partnership; Biotechnology industry; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; STRATEGIC ALLIANCES; PROCESS INNOVATIONS; FIRM CAPABILITIES; STRUCTURAL HOLES; PRODUCT; BIOTECHNOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; EXPLORATION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1007/s10490-008-9114-3
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
How do a firm's internal capabilities and external partnerships contribute to its product and process innovativeness? How do their impacts differ? Based on the theoretical framework of exploitation and exploration, we develop an integrative model linking the impact of both internal capabilities and external partnerships on product and process innovativeness. Survey responses from Taiwanese biotechnology firms indicate that research and development (R&D), marketing, and manufacturing capabilities have different effects on product and process innovativeness. Of the four types of external partnerships, only partnerships with universities and research institutes seem to add value, whereas partnerships with suppliers, customers, and competitors do not contribute to innovativeness. Moreover, marketing capability and customer partnerships have a positive interaction effect on product innovativeness, while manufacturing capability and supplier partnerships have a positive interaction effect on process innovativeness.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 331
页数:23
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: Implications for product and process innovation [J].
Adner, R ;
Levinthal, D .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (05) :611-628
[2]  
Aiken L.S., 1991, Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
[3]   Cross-functional influence in new product development: An exploratory study of marketing and R&D perspectives [J].
Atuahene-Gima, K ;
Evangelista, F .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (10) :1269-1284
[4]   National systems of biotechnology innovation: Complex interdependence in the global system [J].
Bartholomew, S .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 1997, 28 (02) :241-266
[5]   Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups [J].
Baum, JAC ;
Silverman, BS .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2004, 19 (03) :411-436
[6]  
Baum JAC, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P267, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-8
[8]  
Chesbrough HW., 2003, Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-8691.2008.00502.X
[9]  
Christensen CM, 1996, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V17, P197, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199603)17:3<197::AID-SMJ804>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-U