Effect of shearing rate on the behavior of geogrid-reinforced railroad ballast under direct shear conditions

被引:83
作者
Sweta, Kumari [1 ]
Hussaini, Syed Khaja Karimullah [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Patna, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Patna 801103, Bihar, India
关键词
Geosynthetics; Ballast; Large-scale direct shear test; Ballast-geogrid interfaces; Rate of shearing (S-r); Friction angle (phi); RAILWAY BALLAST; INTERFACES; GEOSYNTHETICS; DEFORMATION; DEGRADATION; FREQUENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.12.001
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
A series of large-scale direct shear tests were conducted to investigate the behavior of unreinforced and geogrid reinforced ballast at different rates of shearing. Fresh granite ballast with an average particle size (D-50) of 42 nun and five geogrids having different aperture shapes and sizes was used in this study. Tests were performed at different normal stresses (sigma(n)) ranging from 35 kPa to 140 kPa and at different rates of shearing (S-r) ranging from 2.5 to 10.0 mm/min. The laboratory test results revealed that the shear strength of ballast was significantly Influenced by the rate of shearing. The internal friction angle of ballast (phi) was found to decrease from 66.5 degrees to 58 degrees when the shearing rate (S-r)was increased from 2.5 to 10.0 mm/min. It is further observed that the interface shear strength has improved significantly when the ballast was reinforced with geogrids. The interface efficiency factor (alpha), defined as the ratio of the shear strength of the interface to the internal shear strength of ballast, varies from 0.83 to 1.06. The sieve analysis of samples after the testing reveals that a significant amount of particle breakage occurs during shearing. The value of breakage, evaluated in terms of Marsal's breakage index (B-g), increases from 5.12 to 13.24% with an increase in shearing rates from 2.5 to 10.0 mm/min. Moreover, the Influence of aperture shape and size of geogrid on the behavior of ballast-geogrid interfaces was also examined in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 256
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Bakeer R.M., 1998, GEOTEXT GEOMEMBRANES, V16, P119, DOI [10.1016/S0266-1144(97)10025-5, DOI 10.1016/S0266-1144(97)10025-5]
[2]  
Bathurst R.J., 1987, Transportation Research Record, V1153, P8
[3]   An evaluation of the interface behaviour of rail subballast stabilised with geogrids and geomembranes [J].
Biabani, M. Mahdi ;
Indraratna, Buddhima .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2015, 43 (03) :240-249
[4]  
Cancelli A., 1992, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Earth Reinforcement Practice, Kyushu, Vol, V1, P29
[5]   Geogrid-reinforcement and the critical state of graded aggregates used in heavy-haul railway transition subgrade [J].
Chen, Xiaobin ;
Jia, Yu ;
Zhang, Jiasheng .
TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS, 2017, 11 :27-40
[6]   THIN-LAYER ELEMENT FOR INTERFACES AND JOINTS [J].
DESAI, CS ;
ZAMAN, MM ;
LIGHTNER, JG ;
SIRIWARDANE, HJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 1984, 8 (01) :19-43
[7]   Numerical analysis of tensile behavior of geogrids with rectangular and triangular apertures [J].
Dong, Yan-Li ;
Han, Jie ;
Bai, Xiao-Hong .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2011, 29 (02) :83-91
[8]   Laboratory and field investigation of the effect of geogrid-reinforced ballast on railway track lateral resistance [J].
Esmaeili, Morteza ;
Zakeri, Jabbar Ali ;
Babaei, Mohammad .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2017, 45 (02) :23-33
[9]  
Hussaini S.K.K., 2012, 11 AUSTR NZ C GEOM G, P1268
[10]  
Hussaini S.K.K., 2016, TRANSPORTATION GEOTE, V6, P45