Does an asymmetric lobe in digital rectal examination include any risk for prostate cancer? results of 1495 biopsies

被引:1
作者
Yilmaz, Omer [1 ]
Kurul, Ozgur [1 ]
Ates, Ferhat [1 ]
Soydan, Hasan [1 ]
Aktas, Zeki [1 ]
机构
[1] GATA Haydarpasa Teaching Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL | 2016年 / 42卷 / 04期
关键词
Prostate; Neoplasms; Digital Rectal Examination; BENIGN PROSTATE; ANTIGEN LEVELS; MEN; TRIAL; VARIABILITY; HYPERPLASIA; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0598
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Despite the well-known findings related to malignity in DRE such as nodule and induration, asymmetry of prostatic lobes, seen relatively, were investigated in a few studies as a predictor of prostate cancer so that there is no universally expected conclusion about asymmetry. We aimed to compare cancer detection rate of normal, asymmetric or suspicious findings in DRE by using biopsy results. Materials and Methods: Data of 1495 patients underwent prostate biopsy between 2006-2014 were searched retrospectively. Biopsy indications were abnormal DRE and or elevated PSA level(>4ng/mL). DRE findings were recorded as Group 1: Benign DRE, Group 2: Asymmetry and Group 3: Nodule/induration. Age, prostatic volume, biopsy results and PSA levels were recorded. Results: Mean age, prostate volume and PSA level were 66.72, 55.98 cc and 18.61ng/mL respectively. Overall cancer detection rate was 38.66 % (575 of 1495). PSA levels were similar in group 1 and 2 but significantly higher in group 3. Prostatic volume was similar in group 1 and 2 and significantly lower in Group 3. Malignity detection rate of group 1,2 and 3 were 28.93%, 34.89% and 55.99% respectively. Group 1 and 2 were similar (p=0.105) but 3 had more chance for cancer detection. Conclusion: Nodule is the most important finding in DRE for cancer detection. Only an asymmetric prostate itself does not mean malignity.
引用
收藏
页码:704 / 709
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Digital rectal examination for detecting prostate cancer at prostate specific antigen levels of 4 ng/ml or less
    Carvalhal, GF
    Smith, DS
    Mager, DE
    Ramos, C
    Catalona, WJ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (03) : 835 - 839
  • [42] PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION, AND TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND IN PREDICTING THE PROBABILITY OF CANCER
    DRAGO, JR
    YORK, JP
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 49 (03) : 172 - 175
  • [43] Prostate Cancer Detection by Using Digital Rectal Examination: Contemporary Practice Patterns in the United States
    Tourville, Elizabeth A.
    Nguyen, Mike M.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2013, 11 (03) : 263 - 269
  • [44] Prostate Cancer Risk Alleles Significantly Improve Disease Detection and are Associated With Aggressive Features in Patients With a "Normal" Prostate Specific Antigen and Digital Rectal Examination
    Helfand, Brian T.
    Kan, Donghui
    Modi, Parth
    Catalona, William J.
    PROSTATE, 2011, 71 (04) : 394 - 402
  • [45] Digital Anal Rectal Examination Usage Among Individuals at Increased Risk for Anal Cancer
    Nyitray, Alan J.
    Ridolfi, Timothy
    Nitkowski, Jenna L.
    McAuliffe, Timothy A.
    Deshmukh, Ashish R.
    Giuliano, Anna Y.
    Chiao, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2023, 27 (03) : 242 - 247
  • [46] The value of digital rectal examination as a predictor of prostate cancer diagnosis among United States Veterans referred for prostate biopsy
    Issa, Muta M.
    Zasada, Witold
    Ward, Kevin
    Hall, John A.
    Petros, John A.
    Ritenour, Chad W. M.
    Goodman, Michael
    Kleinbaum, David
    Mandel, Jack
    Marshall, Fray F.
    CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION, 2006, 30 (03): : 269 - 275
  • [47] The Role of Digital Rectal Examination Prostate Volume Category in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Its Correlation with the Magnetic Resonance Prostate Volume
    Morote, Juan
    Picola, Natalia
    Munoz-Rodriguez, Jesus
    Paesano, Nahuel
    Ruiz-Plazas, Xavier
    Munoz-Rivero, Marta v.
    Celma, Ana
    Garcia-de Manuel, Gemma
    Miro, Berta
    Abascal, Jose M.
    Servian, Pol
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2024, 42 (02) : 441 - 448
  • [48] Digital Rectal Examination for Prostate Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Naji, Leen
    Randhawa, Harkanwal
    Sohani, Zahra
    Dennis, Brittany
    Lautenbach, Deanna
    Kavanagh, Owen
    Bawor, Monica
    Banfield, Laura
    Profetto, Jason
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2018, 16 (02) : 149 - 154
  • [49] Interpolation to define clinical tumor stage in prostate cancer using clinical description of digital rectal examination
    Evans, Sue M.
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Davis, Ian D.
    Sengupta, Shomik
    Borzeshi, Ehsan Zare
    Sampurno, Fanny
    Millar, Jeremy L.
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 14 (05) : e412 - e419
  • [50] Correlation of digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen levels for detection of prostate cancer: Retrospective analysis results from a tertiary care urology center
    Sarkar, Debansu
    Jain, Pritesh
    Gupta, Piyush
    Pal, Dilip Kumar
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 18 (06) : 1646 - 1650