Does an asymmetric lobe in digital rectal examination include any risk for prostate cancer? results of 1495 biopsies

被引:1
作者
Yilmaz, Omer [1 ]
Kurul, Ozgur [1 ]
Ates, Ferhat [1 ]
Soydan, Hasan [1 ]
Aktas, Zeki [1 ]
机构
[1] GATA Haydarpasa Teaching Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL | 2016年 / 42卷 / 04期
关键词
Prostate; Neoplasms; Digital Rectal Examination; BENIGN PROSTATE; ANTIGEN LEVELS; MEN; TRIAL; VARIABILITY; HYPERPLASIA; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0598
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Despite the well-known findings related to malignity in DRE such as nodule and induration, asymmetry of prostatic lobes, seen relatively, were investigated in a few studies as a predictor of prostate cancer so that there is no universally expected conclusion about asymmetry. We aimed to compare cancer detection rate of normal, asymmetric or suspicious findings in DRE by using biopsy results. Materials and Methods: Data of 1495 patients underwent prostate biopsy between 2006-2014 were searched retrospectively. Biopsy indications were abnormal DRE and or elevated PSA level(>4ng/mL). DRE findings were recorded as Group 1: Benign DRE, Group 2: Asymmetry and Group 3: Nodule/induration. Age, prostatic volume, biopsy results and PSA levels were recorded. Results: Mean age, prostate volume and PSA level were 66.72, 55.98 cc and 18.61ng/mL respectively. Overall cancer detection rate was 38.66 % (575 of 1495). PSA levels were similar in group 1 and 2 but significantly higher in group 3. Prostatic volume was similar in group 1 and 2 and significantly lower in Group 3. Malignity detection rate of group 1,2 and 3 were 28.93%, 34.89% and 55.99% respectively. Group 1 and 2 were similar (p=0.105) but 3 had more chance for cancer detection. Conclusion: Nodule is the most important finding in DRE for cancer detection. Only an asymmetric prostate itself does not mean malignity.
引用
收藏
页码:704 / 709
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination, and prostate cancer detection: A study based on more than 7000 transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies in Ghana
    Mensah, James Edward
    Akpakli, Evans
    Kyei, Mathew
    Klufio, Kenneth
    Asiedu, Isaac
    Asante, Kweku
    Toboh, Bernard
    Ashaley, Micheal Darko
    Addo, Ben Molai
    Morton, Bernard
    Quist, Erica Akoto
    TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 51
  • [32] Utility of Digital Rectal Examination, Serum Prostate Specific Antigen, and Transrectal Ultrasound in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Developing Country Perspective
    Kash, Deep Par
    Lal, Murli
    Hashmi, Altaf Hussain
    Mubarak, Muhammed
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (07) : 3087 - 3091
  • [33] Prognostic Significance of Digital Rectal Examination and Prostate Specific Antigen in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Arm
    Halpern, Joshua A.
    Shoag, Jonathan E.
    Mittal, Sameer
    Oromendia, Clara
    Ballman, Karla V.
    Hershman, Dawn L.
    Wright, Jason D.
    Shih, Ya-Chen Tina
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Hu, Jim C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (02) : 363 - 368
  • [34] Is it time to phase out digital rectal examination (DRE) in prostate cancer screening and diagnosis?
    Carbin, Danny Darlington
    Misra, Sidharth
    Patil, Krishnaji
    Kusuma, Venkata Ramana Murthy
    SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 69 (03) : 80 - 82
  • [35] The Interobserver variability of digital rectal examination in a large randomized trial for the screening of prostate cancer
    Gosselaar, C.
    Kranse, R.
    Roobol, M. J.
    Roemeling, S.
    Schroder, F. H.
    PROSTATE, 2008, 68 (09) : 985 - 993
  • [36] Screening digital rectal examination and prostate cancer mortality: a case-control study
    Richert-Boe, KE
    Humphrey, LL
    Glass, AG
    Weiss, NS
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 1998, 5 (02) : 99 - 103
  • [37] Evaluation of prostatic specific antigen and digital rectal examination as screening tests for prostate cancer
    Candas, B
    Cusan, L
    Gomez, JL
    Diamond, P
    Suburu, RE
    Lévesque, J
    Brousseau, G
    Bélanger, A
    Labrie, F
    PROSTATE, 2000, 45 (01) : 19 - 35
  • [38] Prostate volume predicts high grade prostate cancer both in digital rectal examination negative (ct1c) and positive (≥ct2) patients
    Yilmaz, Hasan
    Ustuner, Murat
    Ciftci, Seyfettin
    Yavuz, Ufuk
    Ozkan, Tayyar Alp
    Dillioglugil, Ozdal
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2014, 40 (05): : 613 - 619
  • [39] Screening for prostate cancer without digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound:: Results after four years in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam
    Gosselaar, C
    Roobol, MJ
    Roemeling, S
    de Vries, SH
    van der Cruijsen-Koeter, I
    van der Kwast, TH
    Schröder, FH
    PROSTATE, 2006, 66 (06) : 625 - 631
  • [40] The impact of PSA and digital rectal examination on the risk of prostate cancer specific mortality in men with a PSA level <2.5 ng/ml
    Pashtan, Itai
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 38 (05) : 613 - 618