Does an asymmetric lobe in digital rectal examination include any risk for prostate cancer? results of 1495 biopsies

被引:1
|
作者
Yilmaz, Omer [1 ]
Kurul, Ozgur [1 ]
Ates, Ferhat [1 ]
Soydan, Hasan [1 ]
Aktas, Zeki [1 ]
机构
[1] GATA Haydarpasa Teaching Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL | 2016年 / 42卷 / 04期
关键词
Prostate; Neoplasms; Digital Rectal Examination; BENIGN PROSTATE; ANTIGEN LEVELS; MEN; TRIAL; VARIABILITY; HYPERPLASIA; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0598
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Despite the well-known findings related to malignity in DRE such as nodule and induration, asymmetry of prostatic lobes, seen relatively, were investigated in a few studies as a predictor of prostate cancer so that there is no universally expected conclusion about asymmetry. We aimed to compare cancer detection rate of normal, asymmetric or suspicious findings in DRE by using biopsy results. Materials and Methods: Data of 1495 patients underwent prostate biopsy between 2006-2014 were searched retrospectively. Biopsy indications were abnormal DRE and or elevated PSA level(>4ng/mL). DRE findings were recorded as Group 1: Benign DRE, Group 2: Asymmetry and Group 3: Nodule/induration. Age, prostatic volume, biopsy results and PSA levels were recorded. Results: Mean age, prostate volume and PSA level were 66.72, 55.98 cc and 18.61ng/mL respectively. Overall cancer detection rate was 38.66 % (575 of 1495). PSA levels were similar in group 1 and 2 but significantly higher in group 3. Prostatic volume was similar in group 1 and 2 and significantly lower in Group 3. Malignity detection rate of group 1,2 and 3 were 28.93%, 34.89% and 55.99% respectively. Group 1 and 2 were similar (p=0.105) but 3 had more chance for cancer detection. Conclusion: Nodule is the most important finding in DRE for cancer detection. Only an asymmetric prostate itself does not mean malignity.
引用
收藏
页码:704 / 709
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stratification of prostate-specific antigen level and results of transrectal ultrasonography and digital rectal examination as predictors of positive prostate biopsy
    Clark, TWI
    Goldenberg, SL
    Cooperberg, PL
    Wong, AD
    Singer, J
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 1997, 48 (04): : 252 - 258
  • [22] Significance of serum total prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Abdrabo, Abdelkarim A.
    Fadlalla, Adil I.
    Fadl-Elmula, Imad M.
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 32 (11) : 1133 - 1136
  • [23] Is a digital rectal examination necessary in the diagnosis and clinical staging of early prostate cancer?
    Philip, J
    Roy, SD
    Ballal, M
    Foster, CS
    Javlé, P
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 95 (07) : 969 - 971
  • [24] PROSTATE-CANCER IN NONUROLOGICAL PATIENTS WITH NORMAL PROSTATES ON DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION
    HAMMERER, P
    LOY, V
    DIERINGER, J
    HULAND, H
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (03): : 833 - 836
  • [25] Predictive value of digital rectal examination for prostate cancer detection is modified by obesity
    D I Chu
    C De Nunzio
    L Gerber
    J-A Thomas
    E E Calloway
    S Albisinni
    C Senocak
    M G McKeever
    D M Moreira
    A Tubaro
    J W Moul
    S J Freedland
    L L Bañez
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2011, 14 : 346 - 353
  • [26] Digital rectal examination barriers in the context of individual testing for prostate cancer in general
    Vorilhon, Philippe
    Mousnier, Boris
    Cambon, Benoit
    Tanguy, Gilles
    Guy, Laurent
    EXERCER-LA REVUE FRANCOPHONE DE MEDECINE GENERALE, 2012, 23 (104): : 196 - 202
  • [27] Greater extent of prostate inflammation in negative biopsies is associated with lower risk of prostate cancer on repeat biopsy: results from the REDUCE study
    Moreira, D. M.
    Nickel, J. C.
    Andriole, G. L.
    Castro-Santamaria, R.
    Freedland, S. J.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2016, 19 (02) : 180 - 184
  • [28] No increased prostate cancer incidence after negative transrectal ultrasound guided multiple biopsies in men with increased prostate specific antigen and/or abnormal digital rectal examination
    Bill-Axelson, A
    Holmberg, L
    Norlén, B
    Busch, C
    Norberg, M
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (04): : 1180 - 1183
  • [29] The Role of Digital Rectal Examination for Early Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Morote, Juan
    Paesano, Nahuel
    Picola, Natalia
    Munoz-Rodriguez, Jesus
    Ruiz-Plazas, Xavier
    Munoz-Rivero, Marta V.
    Celma, Ana
    Garcia-de Manuel, Gemma
    Miro, Berta
    Abascal, Jose M.
    Servian, Pol
    Mendez, Olga
    Trilla, Enrique
    LIFE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (11):
  • [30] Digital Rectal Examination and the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer-a Study Based on 8 Years and Three Screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam
    Gosselaar, Claartje
    Roobol, Monique J.
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Wolters, Tineke
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (01) : 139 - 147