Persistent Inequality in Educational Attainment and its Institutional Context

被引:319
作者
Pfeffer, Fabian T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Sociol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/esr/jcn026
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Research has repeatedly shown that educational opportunities are distributed unevenly in all countries. Therefore, the question is not whether family background and educational outcomes are related but to what degree they are related. This latter question then invites a comparative perspective. That is, does social inequality in education differ across time and countries If yes, which institutional characteristics can explain differences in educational inequality Educational inequality is conceptualized as the association between individuals and their parents highest educational level attained. Intergenerational educational mobility processes are analysed for 20 industrialized nations by means of log-linear and log-multiplicative models. The results show that the degree of educational mobility has remained stable across the second half of the 20th century in virtually all countries. However, nations differ widely in the extent to which parents education influences their childrens educational attainment. The degree of educational inequality is associated with the institutional structure of national education systems. Rigid systems with dead-end educational pathways appear to be a hindrance to the equalization of educational opportunities, especially if the sorting of students occurs early in the educational career. This association is not mediated by other institutional characteristics included in this analysis that do not exert notable influences on educational mobility.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 565
页数:23
相关论文
共 72 条
[31]  
Gambetta D, 1987, WERE THEY PUSHED DID, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511735868
[32]   Statistical methods and graphical displays for analyzing how the association between two qualitative variables differs among countries, among groups, or over time: A modified regression-type approach [J].
Goodman, LA ;
Hout, M .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY, VOL. 28 1998, 1998, 28 :175-230
[33]   STRUCTURAL MODEL OF MOBILITY TABLE [J].
HAUSER, RM .
SOCIAL FORCES, 1978, 56 (03) :919-953
[34]   Another look at the stratification of educational transitions: The logistic response model with partial proportionality constraints [J].
Hauser, Robert M. ;
Andrew, Megan .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY 2006, VOL 36, 2006, 36 :1-26
[35]  
Herrnstein Richard J., 1994, The bell curve. Intelligence and class structure in american life
[36]  
HEYNS B, 1993, PERSISTENT INEQUALIT
[37]  
Heyns B., 1978, Summer learning and the effects of schooling
[38]  
HILLIARD Betty, 2007, CHANGING IRELAND INT
[39]   TYPOLOGY FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS [J].
HOPPER, EI .
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 1968, 2 (01) :29-46
[40]  
Hout Michael, 1983, Mobility tables